Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Standing of Insolvency Administrators in Investment Treaty Arbitration

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F22%3A10448185" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/22:10448185 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Standing of Insolvency Administrators in Investment Treaty Arbitration

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    This chapter explores the consequences of an insolvency administration for the standing of claimants in investment arbitration. In practice, the imposition of the insolvency administration on the claimant investor is a frequently invoked ground for a challenge of its standing in the arbitral proceedings. During insolvency, an indebted legal entity is generally represented by an administrator who primarily supervises its activities and takes steps with a view to business rescue or, where this is not possible, sale of the estate. The scope of the administrator&apos;s powers largely depends on the type of the insolvency proceedings and differs also across individual jurisdictions. As the common goal is maximising the value of the debtor&apos;s assets, the administrators are usually empowered to grant or refuse authorisation for the debtors&apos; legal acts and to varying degrees also dispose of the estate. For investors involved in arbitration against the host state, insolvency may bring several practical difficulties as administrators can assume the power to represent the claimant in the proceedings instead of legal counsels and their control over the investor&apos;s activities can raise doubts as to the claimant&apos;s nationality pursuant to the applicable investment agreement. Furthermore, although insolvency administrators are required to act impartially and independently in discharging their duties, one can also point to the risk of the host state abusing insolvency to subvert the arbitral proceedings and compel the claimant to withdraw its claims. In this regard, tribunals are required to adopt adequate safeguards to prevent any abuse of process.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Standing of Insolvency Administrators in Investment Treaty Arbitration

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    This chapter explores the consequences of an insolvency administration for the standing of claimants in investment arbitration. In practice, the imposition of the insolvency administration on the claimant investor is a frequently invoked ground for a challenge of its standing in the arbitral proceedings. During insolvency, an indebted legal entity is generally represented by an administrator who primarily supervises its activities and takes steps with a view to business rescue or, where this is not possible, sale of the estate. The scope of the administrator&apos;s powers largely depends on the type of the insolvency proceedings and differs also across individual jurisdictions. As the common goal is maximising the value of the debtor&apos;s assets, the administrators are usually empowered to grant or refuse authorisation for the debtors&apos; legal acts and to varying degrees also dispose of the estate. For investors involved in arbitration against the host state, insolvency may bring several practical difficulties as administrators can assume the power to represent the claimant in the proceedings instead of legal counsels and their control over the investor&apos;s activities can raise doubts as to the claimant&apos;s nationality pursuant to the applicable investment agreement. Furthermore, although insolvency administrators are required to act impartially and independently in discharging their duties, one can also point to the risk of the host state abusing insolvency to subvert the arbitral proceedings and compel the claimant to withdraw its claims. In this regard, tribunals are required to adopt adequate safeguards to prevent any abuse of process.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    C - Kapitola v odborné knize

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50501 - Law

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název knihy nebo sborníku

    Crossroads of Insolvency and Arbitration

  • ISBN

    978-94-035-4531-8

  • Počet stran výsledku

    23

  • Strana od-do

    41-63

  • Počet stran knihy

    245

  • Název nakladatele

    Kluwer Law International B.V.

  • Místo vydání

    Alphen aan den Rijn

  • Kód UT WoS kapitoly