Conviction following an appeal against an aquittal in criminal process - wider context, advantages, risks and limits

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F23%3A10475348" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/23:10475348 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=T3m16RX9xT" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=T3m16RX9xT</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Conviction following an appeal against an aquittal in criminal process - wider context, advantages, risks and limits

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This study1 deals with exceptions of the right to appeal in criminal matters. This right is enshrined in Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The aim of this study is primarily to draw attention to the exceptions to the right of appeal in criminal matters, based on the available literature and not very rich case law of the ECtHR, to confront them with Czech law. The core of the paper presented is an analysis of Article 2(2) of Protocol No. 7 to the ECHR. There are three exceptions oncerning the right of appeal in criminal matters, which are regulated in Article 2(2) of Protocol No. 7 to the ECHR. Firstly, the exceptions apply to offences of a minor character, secondly, the situation where the first instance decision was made by the highest court authority, and finally, the conviction on the basis of an appeal against a judgement of acquittal. The study concludes that the provision of Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the ECHR is an important provision, but it is not a firm guarantee, as an essential part of the regulation is left up to national law (§ 1) and there are specified several exceptions as well (§ 2). Czech law is taken into account in this study.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Conviction following an appeal against an aquittal in criminal process - wider context, advantages, risks and limits

Popis výsledku anglicky

This study1 deals with exceptions of the right to appeal in criminal matters. This right is enshrined in Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The aim of this study is primarily to draw attention to the exceptions to the right of appeal in criminal matters, based on the available literature and not very rich case law of the ECtHR, to confront them with Czech law. The core of the paper presented is an analysis of Article 2(2) of Protocol No. 7 to the ECHR. There are three exceptions oncerning the right of appeal in criminal matters, which are regulated in Article 2(2) of Protocol No. 7 to the ECHR. Firstly, the exceptions apply to offences of a minor character, secondly, the situation where the first instance decision was made by the highest court authority, and finally, the conviction on the basis of an appeal against a judgement of acquittal. The study concludes that the provision of Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the ECHR is an important provision, but it is not a firm guarantee, as an essential part of the regulation is left up to national law (§ 1) and there are specified several exceptions as well (§ 2). Czech law is taken into account in this study.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law

ISSN

1805-0565

e-ISSN

1805-0999

Svazek periodika

2023

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

14

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

243-260

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85185694371