Economic Sanctions Against Individuals and Human Rights Law

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F24%3A10481677" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/24:10481677 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=gI2QqQ.bfe" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=gI2QqQ.bfe</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Economic Sanctions Against Individuals and Human Rights Law

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper discusses human rights implications of economic sanctions against individuals, typically asset freezing. It shows that it is now largely accepted that States (and the EU), when implementing sanctions imposed by other actors (the UN) remain responsible for the compatibility of the implementing measures with human rights and that individuals targeted by sanctions are within their jurisdiction. The paper also demonstrates that economic sanctions against individuals may violate certain procedural rights, mainly the right to be heard and the right to effective remedies. Finally it argues that although sanctions could also interfere with substantive human rights, such as the right to property or the right to privacy, (quasi)judicial bodies have been reluctant to discuss their effects on these rights.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Economic Sanctions Against Individuals and Human Rights Law

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper discusses human rights implications of economic sanctions against individuals, typically asset freezing. It shows that it is now largely accepted that States (and the EU), when implementing sanctions imposed by other actors (the UN) remain responsible for the compatibility of the implementing measures with human rights and that individuals targeted by sanctions are within their jurisdiction. The paper also demonstrates that economic sanctions against individuals may violate certain procedural rights, mainly the right to be heard and the right to effective remedies. Finally it argues that although sanctions could also interfere with substantive human rights, such as the right to property or the right to privacy, (quasi)judicial bodies have been reluctant to discuss their effects on these rights.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Austrian Review of International and European Law

ISSN

1385-1306

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2024

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

AT - Rakouská republika

Počet stran výsledku

26

Strana od-do

193-218

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105002802568