Comparative Study on Refunds Stipulated in the Budgetary Discipline Enforcement Regulatory Framework in the Visegrád Countries

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F24%3A10482538" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/24:10482538 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=ZxMUzkWNqV" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=ZxMUzkWNqV</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparative Study on Refunds Stipulated in the Budgetary Discipline Enforcement Regulatory Framework in the Visegrád Countries

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Refunds play a crucial role in enforcing budgetary discipline across regulatory frameworks, ensuring that public funds remain aligned with their intended purposes. This article aims to explore the similarities and differences of the budgetary enforcement regulatory framework with respect to refunds among Visegrád countries. The article concludes that the legal regulation of the refunds is considerably similar, however, there are several notable differences in the refund regulation amongst the Visegrád countries that are further discussed in the article. Utilizing a comparative method of research, primarily based on a questionnaire survey conducted by the authors and responded to by a team of legal scholars, this article offers valuable insights for legal scholarship and policymaking within the Visegrád countries.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparative Study on Refunds Stipulated in the Budgetary Discipline Enforcement Regulatory Framework in the Visegrád Countries

Popis výsledku anglicky

Refunds play a crucial role in enforcing budgetary discipline across regulatory frameworks, ensuring that public funds remain aligned with their intended purposes. This article aims to explore the similarities and differences of the budgetary enforcement regulatory framework with respect to refunds among Visegrád countries. The article concludes that the legal regulation of the refunds is considerably similar, however, there are several notable differences in the refund regulation amongst the Visegrád countries that are further discussed in the article. Utilizing a comparative method of research, primarily based on a questionnaire survey conducted by the authors and responded to by a team of legal scholars, this article offers valuable insights for legal scholarship and policymaking within the Visegrád countries.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA22-06792S" target="_blank" >GA22-06792S: Sjednocený a jasný model právní regulace vynucování rozpočtové kázně ve střední Evropě</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

The Lawyer Quarterly

ISSN

1805-8396

e-ISSN

1805-840X

Svazek periodika

14

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

290-308

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85204397695