ANALYSIS OF THE NOTION OF DIGITAL ASSETS IN THE CONTEXT OF FRAGMENTED TERMINOLOGY

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F24%3A10484857" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/24:10484857 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=fEFxWkMWhE" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=fEFxWkMWhE</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

ANALYSIS OF THE NOTION OF DIGITAL ASSETS IN THE CONTEXT OF FRAGMENTED TERMINOLOGY

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The subject of this article is the terminology concerning all that is digital and intangible. In the past decades, many similar notions describing the essentially same phenomenon appeared - virtual property, digital content, digital assets, or data. However, most of these terms are not codified legal notions and as a result, their understanding in the literature or soft law instruments differs. Various bodies, including UNIDROIT, ELI, and the UK Law Commission, have recently addressed the topic of digital assets and private law and provided their definitions of the notion. Moreover, with the new EU digital legal framework, we may see attempts to codify notions such as data, digital content, or cryptoassets. The aim of this paper is to analyse the understanding of the notion of digital assets, put it into a broader context and identify how this notion overlaps with others. The main argument is that the difference between the notions is unclear which puts the policymakers into a tough position in which it is difficult to avoid overlapping regulation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

ANALYSIS OF THE NOTION OF DIGITAL ASSETS IN THE CONTEXT OF FRAGMENTED TERMINOLOGY

Popis výsledku anglicky

The subject of this article is the terminology concerning all that is digital and intangible. In the past decades, many similar notions describing the essentially same phenomenon appeared - virtual property, digital content, digital assets, or data. However, most of these terms are not codified legal notions and as a result, their understanding in the literature or soft law instruments differs. Various bodies, including UNIDROIT, ELI, and the UK Law Commission, have recently addressed the topic of digital assets and private law and provided their definitions of the notion. Moreover, with the new EU digital legal framework, we may see attempts to codify notions such as data, digital content, or cryptoassets. The aim of this paper is to analyse the understanding of the notion of digital assets, put it into a broader context and identify how this notion overlaps with others. The main argument is that the difference between the notions is unclear which puts the policymakers into a tough position in which it is difficult to avoid overlapping regulation.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

The Lawyer Quarterly

ISSN

1805-8396

e-ISSN

1805-840X

Svazek periodika

14

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

385-404

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85204390969