Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

The Notion of "Sanctions" and "Countermeasures" in International Law

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F24%3A10489908" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/24:10489908 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69019-8_2" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69019-8_2</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69019-8_2" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-031-69019-8_2</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    The Notion of "Sanctions" and "Countermeasures" in International Law

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The issue of &quot;sanctions&quot; applied by states and some international organizations (mainly the EU), which are not directly harmed entities, is one of the most complex issues in the theory and practice of contemporary international law, not just because of their frequency and scope in the last two decades. It came into the spotlight again due to the very extensive and gradually supplemented restrictive measures taken by the EU against Russia, firstly after the annexation of Crimea in 2014, but mainly in response to the aggression against Ukraine from February 2022. These coercive measures are not Security Council sanctions under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, but individual measures of some states and the EU (which has no more rights in this regard than the states themselves). Therefore, the legality of the measures of the EU, the US, and some other states must be assessed according to their content and on the basis of international law. Some of the measures are not legally prohibited by their content (retorsion) or their legality can be established on treaty-based exceptions and clauses on the protection of security interests. For others, we can find their justification based on the rules of general international law, as a countermeasure. This institute is the modern equivalent of traditional peaceful reprisals, the current regulation of which can be found in the Articles on State Responsibility (ARSIWA) adopted by the International Law Commission.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    The Notion of "Sanctions" and "Countermeasures" in International Law

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The issue of &quot;sanctions&quot; applied by states and some international organizations (mainly the EU), which are not directly harmed entities, is one of the most complex issues in the theory and practice of contemporary international law, not just because of their frequency and scope in the last two decades. It came into the spotlight again due to the very extensive and gradually supplemented restrictive measures taken by the EU against Russia, firstly after the annexation of Crimea in 2014, but mainly in response to the aggression against Ukraine from February 2022. These coercive measures are not Security Council sanctions under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, but individual measures of some states and the EU (which has no more rights in this regard than the states themselves). Therefore, the legality of the measures of the EU, the US, and some other states must be assessed according to their content and on the basis of international law. Some of the measures are not legally prohibited by their content (retorsion) or their legality can be established on treaty-based exceptions and clauses on the protection of security interests. For others, we can find their justification based on the rules of general international law, as a countermeasure. This institute is the modern equivalent of traditional peaceful reprisals, the current regulation of which can be found in the Articles on State Responsibility (ARSIWA) adopted by the International Law Commission.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    C - Kapitola v odborné knize

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50501 - Law

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2024

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název knihy nebo sborníku

    International Sanctions and Human Rights

  • ISBN

    978-3-031-69018-1

  • Počet stran výsledku

    22

  • Strana od-do

    13-34

  • Počet stran knihy

    294

  • Název nakladatele

    Springer

  • Místo vydání

    Cham

  • Kód UT WoS kapitoly