Assessing the Legal Boundaries of Military Support to Ukraine from the Perspective of Use of Force
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F25%3A10497544" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/25:10497544 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=nBhvpnrbm7" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=nBhvpnrbm7</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15730352-bja10114" target="_blank" >10.1163/15730352-bja10114</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Assessing the Legal Boundaries of Military Support to Ukraine from the Perspective of Use of Force
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Military support provided by states to Ukraine in its armed conflict with Russia sparked debates about its compliance with international law. While ius contra bellum allows third states to use force in collective self-defence, none of the Ukraine supporting states have reported to the UNSC. Proclamations of these states have even avoided using terminology of ius contra bellum. The ICJ has however already stated in the context of one state arming and training of a non-state actor in another state that such support may qualify as use of force. Transferability of this conclusion to the context of an IAC is controversial though. Using the example of Russia-Ukraine war, the article analyses whether military support provided by state(s) to one of the parties of an IAC may establish use of force against the adversary-state of the supported one by the supporter and continues by assessing the possible ius contra bellum-based justifications.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Assessing the Legal Boundaries of Military Support to Ukraine from the Perspective of Use of Force
Popis výsledku anglicky
Military support provided by states to Ukraine in its armed conflict with Russia sparked debates about its compliance with international law. While ius contra bellum allows third states to use force in collective self-defence, none of the Ukraine supporting states have reported to the UNSC. Proclamations of these states have even avoided using terminology of ius contra bellum. The ICJ has however already stated in the context of one state arming and training of a non-state actor in another state that such support may qualify as use of force. Transferability of this conclusion to the context of an IAC is controversial though. Using the example of Russia-Ukraine war, the article analyses whether military support provided by state(s) to one of the parties of an IAC may establish use of force against the adversary-state of the supported one by the supporter and continues by assessing the possible ius contra bellum-based justifications.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Review of Central and East European Law
ISSN
0925-9880
e-ISSN
1573-0352
Svazek periodika
2025
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1-2
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
23
Strana od-do
87-109
Kód UT WoS článku
001526701600005
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105004291283