Case 8 : Sun City : Urban Planning, Private Property, and Procedural Fairness (Duty of Consideration) : Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F25%3A10498840" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/25:10498840 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Case 8 : Sun City : Urban Planning, Private Property, and Procedural Fairness (Duty of Consideration) : Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Through extensive comparative research, this book examines this increasingly important field of administrative law. It focuses mainly on Europe, analysing ten national systems including eight European Union member states, Norway, and the United Kingdom, but it also explores the legal systems of the United States and China, as well as that of a non-state entity-the European Union itself.The questions investigated across these systems include whether administrative agencies may fetter their discretion through policy and rules, whether their rules must be published, and what remedies are available when plans adversely impact individual rights. These questions are examined through a factual analysis based on a set of ten hypothetical cases, which are discussed by national experts.This comparative approach identifies commonalities and differences between legal systems, such as in consultation and transparency, in the rights of public service users, and in legal remedies to address rules and plans. As in other volumes in the series, both similarity and difference are essential to understanding how a &apos;common core&apos; is shaped and evolves.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Case 8 : Sun City : Urban Planning, Private Property, and Procedural Fairness (Duty of Consideration) : Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

Through extensive comparative research, this book examines this increasingly important field of administrative law. It focuses mainly on Europe, analysing ten national systems including eight European Union member states, Norway, and the United Kingdom, but it also explores the legal systems of the United States and China, as well as that of a non-state entity-the European Union itself.The questions investigated across these systems include whether administrative agencies may fetter their discretion through policy and rules, whether their rules must be published, and what remedies are available when plans adversely impact individual rights. These questions are examined through a factual analysis based on a set of ten hypothetical cases, which are discussed by national experts.This comparative approach identifies commonalities and differences between legal systems, such as in consultation and transparency, in the rights of public service users, and in legal remedies to address rules and plans. As in other volumes in the series, both similarity and difference are essential to understanding how a &apos;common core&apos; is shaped and evolves.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Administrative Rulemaking and Planning in European Laws

ISBN

978-0-19-886761-6

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

210-214

Počet stran knihy

319

Název nakladatele

Oxford University Press

Místo vydání

Oxford

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—