Conflict-of-Law Provisions in the Labyrinth of the European Space Law

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F25%3A10505968" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/25:10505968 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=OPf19.0gc7" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=OPf19.0gc7</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.57574/596557764" target="_blank" >10.57574/596557764</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Conflict-of-Law Provisions in the Labyrinth of the European Space Law

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article aims to contribute to the scholarship on the emergence of European Space Law. It seeks to deal with the question of how the national space acts, as recently adopted in Europe, cope with each other. Thus, this article does not aim to analyse the entire content of the recently adopted national space legislation but focuses entirely on the problem of the existence or absence of conflict-of-law provisions in national space acts. Firstly, the article addresses the issue of state responsibility for national space activities under international space law. After that, three major recent approaches to conflict-of-law provisions in the national space acts are being analysed. Firstly, examples of the unilateralist approach are presented (Austria, Slovakia), and the disadvantages of this approach are identified. Further examples of conflictof-law provisions, which provide for modifications in territorial (Portugal) and personal (the Principality of Liechtenstein, Cyprus, and France) jurisdiction, are presented. In this respect, this article also provides a brief critical analysis of the recently published proposal for a future EU Space Law with respect of conflict-of-law issues.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Conflict-of-Law Provisions in the Labyrinth of the European Space Law

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article aims to contribute to the scholarship on the emergence of European Space Law. It seeks to deal with the question of how the national space acts, as recently adopted in Europe, cope with each other. Thus, this article does not aim to analyse the entire content of the recently adopted national space legislation but focuses entirely on the problem of the existence or absence of conflict-of-law provisions in national space acts. Firstly, the article addresses the issue of state responsibility for national space activities under international space law. After that, three major recent approaches to conflict-of-law provisions in the national space acts are being analysed. Firstly, examples of the unilateralist approach are presented (Austria, Slovakia), and the disadvantages of this approach are identified. Further examples of conflictof-law provisions, which provide for modifications in territorial (Portugal) and personal (the Principality of Liechtenstein, Cyprus, and France) jurisdiction, are presented. In this respect, this article also provides a brief critical analysis of the recently published proposal for a future EU Space Law with respect of conflict-of-law issues.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Rivista del Diritto della Navigazione

ISSN

0035-5895

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

91

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

IT - Italská republika

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

87-103

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105026371694