Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Shareholders’ Power to Manage the Company’s Business in a Private Limited Company – the Case of Czechia in an International Context

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F25%3A10507183" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/25:10507183 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=iFd8fiHF1g" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=iFd8fiHF1g</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2025.396" target="_blank" >10.14712/23366478.2025.396</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Shareholders’ Power to Manage the Company’s Business in a Private Limited Company – the Case of Czechia in an International Context

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The legal regulation of the Czech limited liability company is distinctive in an international context. While many foreign jurisdictions, to varying degrees, allow shareholders to influence the business management of the company through the general meeting and, for this purpose, to instruct the director (or even decide on a particular matter themselves), Czech company law, as a general rule, explicitly prohibits such a procedure, except where expressly permitted by law. According to established case law, no contrary conclusion may be drawn, even in view of the differing nature of a limited liability company as opposed to a joint stock company. However, Czech case law and legal doctrine regrettably fail to explore the underlying rationale and objectives of this prohibition in depth.A comparison with the legal framework governing limited liability companies in Germany, Austria, Slovakia, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia suggests that shareholders&apos; intervention in the business management of a limited liability company can be functional, provided that the protection of minority shareholders and creditors remains unaffected and appropriate regard is paid to the director&apos;s liability towards the company. Even these issues, however, can be adequately addressed within the existing framework of Czech legal scholarship.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Shareholders’ Power to Manage the Company’s Business in a Private Limited Company – the Case of Czechia in an International Context

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The legal regulation of the Czech limited liability company is distinctive in an international context. While many foreign jurisdictions, to varying degrees, allow shareholders to influence the business management of the company through the general meeting and, for this purpose, to instruct the director (or even decide on a particular matter themselves), Czech company law, as a general rule, explicitly prohibits such a procedure, except where expressly permitted by law. According to established case law, no contrary conclusion may be drawn, even in view of the differing nature of a limited liability company as opposed to a joint stock company. However, Czech case law and legal doctrine regrettably fail to explore the underlying rationale and objectives of this prohibition in depth.A comparison with the legal framework governing limited liability companies in Germany, Austria, Slovakia, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia suggests that shareholders&apos; intervention in the business management of a limited liability company can be functional, provided that the protection of minority shareholders and creditors remains unaffected and appropriate regard is paid to the director&apos;s liability towards the company. Even these issues, however, can be adequately addressed within the existing framework of Czech legal scholarship.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50501 - Law

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Iuridica

  • ISSN

    0323-0619

  • e-ISSN

    2336-6478

  • Svazek periodika

    71

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    2

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    CZ - Česká republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    15

  • Strana od-do

    153-167

  • Kód UT WoS článku

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-105007575228