Possible Ways to the Creation of the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F25%3A10507916" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/25:10507916 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://brill.com/display/book/9789004740945/b_9789004740945-005.xml" target="_blank" >https://brill.com/display/book/9789004740945/b_9789004740945-005.xml</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004740945_005" target="_blank" >10.1163/9789004740945_005</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Possible Ways to the Creation of the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Although international criminal justice has become part of the mainstream of international law theory over the past 30 years, the international community has never faced the challenge of creating a tribunal to prosecute the crime of aggression during this period. Indeed, all of the international or mixed criminal tribunals that have been established since the first half of the 1990s have had their subject matter jurisdiction limited to the crime of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes, or only some of them, or also to certain other serious crimes under international or domestic law. By contrast, the crime of aggression, under the older name the crime against peace, was first and last tried internationally before the international military tribunals at Nuremberg and Tokyo, established immediately after World War. According to the opinion of the Nuremberg Tribunal, &quot;those who wage aggressive war are doing that which is equally illegal, and of much greater moment than a breach of one of the rules of the Hague Convention&quot;, It is interesting that the Nuremberg definition of the crime against peace includes the term &quot;war of aggression&quot; but it was left completely undefined, despite the effort of Justice Robert Jackson in London.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Possible Ways to the Creation of the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression

Popis výsledku anglicky

Although international criminal justice has become part of the mainstream of international law theory over the past 30 years, the international community has never faced the challenge of creating a tribunal to prosecute the crime of aggression during this period. Indeed, all of the international or mixed criminal tribunals that have been established since the first half of the 1990s have had their subject matter jurisdiction limited to the crime of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes, or only some of them, or also to certain other serious crimes under international or domestic law. By contrast, the crime of aggression, under the older name the crime against peace, was first and last tried internationally before the international military tribunals at Nuremberg and Tokyo, established immediately after World War. According to the opinion of the Nuremberg Tribunal, &quot;those who wage aggressive war are doing that which is equally illegal, and of much greater moment than a breach of one of the rules of the Hague Convention&quot;, It is interesting that the Nuremberg definition of the crime against peace includes the term &quot;war of aggression&quot; but it was left completely undefined, despite the effort of Justice Robert Jackson in London.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Special Judicial Mechanism for the Crime of Aggression Committed against Ukraine

ISBN

978-90-04-74093-8

Počet stran výsledku

29

Strana od-do

35-63

Počet stran knihy

229

Název nakladatele

Brill Nijhoff

Místo vydání

Leiden

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—