Russian national identity: beyond "empire" versus "nation" dichotomy

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F11%3A10103282" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/11:10103282 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://alppi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/pavleeva.pdf" target="_blank" >http://alppi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/pavleeva.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Russian national identity: beyond "empire" versus "nation" dichotomy

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The ostentatious merging of national and imperial identities in modern Russian consciousness is considered one of the main reasons for the failure of Russian nation-building. The assumption that in Russia empire-building obstructed nation-building and that "nation" and "empire" were (and, from the point of view of many observers, still are) mingled in Russian national consciousness dominates contemporary historiography. The main goal of this article is not to refute this assumption, but to show that theconflict between these two categories had a more complex dynamism than is presented in most of the studies and to demonstrate how the analysis of such a controversial and subtle matter as national identity in a multiethnic empire may suffer from insensibility to historical nuances and careless generalizations. First of all, I analyze the new factors that cast doubt on the established relationships between "national" and "imperial" in scholarly literature and in previous theorizing on na

Název v anglickém jazyce

Russian national identity: beyond "empire" versus "nation" dichotomy

Popis výsledku anglicky

The ostentatious merging of national and imperial identities in modern Russian consciousness is considered one of the main reasons for the failure of Russian nation-building. The assumption that in Russia empire-building obstructed nation-building and that "nation" and "empire" were (and, from the point of view of many observers, still are) mingled in Russian national consciousness dominates contemporary historiography. The main goal of this article is not to refute this assumption, but to show that theconflict between these two categories had a more complex dynamism than is presented in most of the studies and to demonstrate how the analysis of such a controversial and subtle matter as national identity in a multiethnic empire may suffer from insensibility to historical nuances and careless generalizations. First of all, I analyze the new factors that cast doubt on the established relationships between "national" and "imperial" in scholarly literature and in previous theorizing on na

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AB - Dějiny

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2011

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

The Annual of Language & Politics and Politics of Identity

ISSN

1803-1757

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

5

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

41-56

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—