Opening-up the black box of participation: a reception study into the conditions of possibility of mediated participatory practices
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F12%3A10124714" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/12:10124714 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Opening-up the black box of participation: a reception study into the conditions of possibility of mediated participatory practices
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Within the Web 2.0 hype, participation (again) became a key signifier, promising the fulfilment of our democratic fantasies. This chapter aims to add to the debates on the democratic revolution and the political-ideological significance of mediated participation by comparing the reception of two North Belgian participatory media products. One of these case studies is based on the "new" world of a YouTube-like online platform called 16plus, the second case study is based on the "old" concept of access television in a 2002 TV programme called Barometer. In both cases, the reception study shows little enthusiasm or downright rejection from the part of their audiences, although the focus group members still use a maximalist (and almost contradictory) discourse of media democracy, and fiercely critique the mainstream media and their professionals. Through an analysis of these multi-layered audience receptions, this chapter will show that participatory practices are not unconditionally appre
Název v anglickém jazyce
Opening-up the black box of participation: a reception study into the conditions of possibility of mediated participatory practices
Popis výsledku anglicky
Within the Web 2.0 hype, participation (again) became a key signifier, promising the fulfilment of our democratic fantasies. This chapter aims to add to the debates on the democratic revolution and the political-ideological significance of mediated participation by comparing the reception of two North Belgian participatory media products. One of these case studies is based on the "new" world of a YouTube-like online platform called 16plus, the second case study is based on the "old" concept of access television in a 2002 TV programme called Barometer. In both cases, the reception study shows little enthusiasm or downright rejection from the part of their audiences, although the focus group members still use a maximalist (and almost contradictory) discourse of media democracy, and fiercely critique the mainstream media and their professionals. Through an analysis of these multi-layered audience receptions, this chapter will show that participatory practices are not unconditionally appre
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
AJ - Písemnictví, mas–media, audiovize
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2012
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
Media in the Swirl
ISBN
978-81-8274-653-4
Počet stran výsledku
19
Strana od-do
155-173
Počet stran knihy
338
Název nakladatele
Pentagon Press
Místo vydání
New Delhi
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—