Programming EU External Action Post-Lisbon: New Opportunities or Business as Usual?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F12%3A10133312" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/12:10133312 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://publications.eipa.eu/en/eipascope/search/&tid=1720" target="_blank" >http://publications.eipa.eu/en/eipascope/search/&tid=1720</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Programming EU External Action Post-Lisbon: New Opportunities or Business as Usual?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Over 90% of the external relations budget of the EU is processed through its external financial instruments. With the Lisbon Treaty and the creation of the new European External Action Service (EEAS), the institutional architecture of these instruments was significantly reformed. This contribution analyses strategic programming both pre- and post-Lisbon, identifies 'winners' and 'losers', and examines the potential of the new provisions to increase the coherence of EU external action. The examination shows that the instruments can be categorised into three groupings: 'the big three' comprising the bulk of funding characterised by joint programming and responsibilities; the 'Commission-only' instruments where all powers remain with the Commission; and the 'EEAS-led rest' in which the High Representative and the EEAS play a strong role but only have limited financial resources available. The new system calls for strong coordination of all involved actors in order to make it work. Finding

Název v anglickém jazyce

Programming EU External Action Post-Lisbon: New Opportunities or Business as Usual?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Over 90% of the external relations budget of the EU is processed through its external financial instruments. With the Lisbon Treaty and the creation of the new European External Action Service (EEAS), the institutional architecture of these instruments was significantly reformed. This contribution analyses strategic programming both pre- and post-Lisbon, identifies 'winners' and 'losers', and examines the potential of the new provisions to increase the coherence of EU external action. The examination shows that the instruments can be categorised into three groupings: 'the big three' comprising the bulk of funding characterised by joint programming and responsibilities; the 'Commission-only' instruments where all powers remain with the Commission; and the 'EEAS-led rest' in which the High Representative and the EEAS play a strong role but only have limited financial resources available. The new system calls for strong coordination of all involved actors in order to make it work. Finding

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Eipascope

ISSN

1025-6253

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

Neuveden

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

25-29

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—