Externalization of policy advice: Theory, methodology and evidence

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F13%3A10144070" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/13:10144070 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.002" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.002</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.002" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.002</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Externalization of policy advice: Theory, methodology and evidence

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper examines to what extent advisory activities previously performed inside the government have been relocated to places outside of government. Although this process, labelled as externalization of policy advice, is widely taken as a universal trend, here it is shown that empirical findings suggest a more complicated picture. The level of externalization differs across policy domains, countries and over time. There are also different meanings of externalization and it has both quantitative and qualitative dimensions. In this article it is argued that the provision of policy advice can be conceptualized in terms of two competing processes: externalization and filling-in. The strengt of these processes depends upon a wide range of factors. An overview of the empirical findings on externalization is provided and the factors assumed to be conducive to externalization are outlined. The article concludes with implications for further research, arguing that empirical research should be

Název v anglickém jazyce

Externalization of policy advice: Theory, methodology and evidence

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper examines to what extent advisory activities previously performed inside the government have been relocated to places outside of government. Although this process, labelled as externalization of policy advice, is widely taken as a universal trend, here it is shown that empirical findings suggest a more complicated picture. The level of externalization differs across policy domains, countries and over time. There are also different meanings of externalization and it has both quantitative and qualitative dimensions. In this article it is argued that the provision of policy advice can be conceptualized in terms of two competing processes: externalization and filling-in. The strengt of these processes depends upon a wide range of factors. An overview of the empirical findings on externalization is provided and the factors assumed to be conducive to externalization are outlined. The article concludes with implications for further research, arguing that empirical research should be

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GAP404%2F12%2F0725" target="_blank" >GAP404/12/0725: Analytici politiky v ústřední státní správě České republiky: praktiky, profesní hodnoty a identita</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Policy and Society

ISSN

1449-4035

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

32

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

199-209

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—