Between Clients and Bureaucrats: an Ambivalent Position of NGOs in the Social Inclusion Agenda in Czech Statutory Cities

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F14%3A10139067" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/14:10139067 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.05.003" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.05.003</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.05.003" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.05.003</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Between Clients and Bureaucrats: an Ambivalent Position of NGOs in the Social Inclusion Agenda in Czech Statutory Cities

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper examines the changing landscape of policy work conducted by NGOs with respect to the social inclusion agenda. Based on qualitative case studies of integration policies of Czech statutory cities, it is focused particularly on the role of institutionalized NGOs and informal activist groups in the subnational policy work and ways to deal with both policy bureaucrats and local citizens. Particularly, the paper intends to answer following questions: In what way might NGOs at this level be considered to have expertise and how their expertise is being constructed? Czech institutionalized NGOs generally do not have a broad membership base; hence their legitimacy does not result from active membership. Rather they need to seek for different sources of legitimacy. Indeed, the access to and use of expertise and professionalization is of crucial importance. We explore the sources and methods NGOs use to identify, formulate and advocate their positions toward local policy makers and publ

Název v anglickém jazyce

Between Clients and Bureaucrats: an Ambivalent Position of NGOs in the Social Inclusion Agenda in Czech Statutory Cities

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper examines the changing landscape of policy work conducted by NGOs with respect to the social inclusion agenda. Based on qualitative case studies of integration policies of Czech statutory cities, it is focused particularly on the role of institutionalized NGOs and informal activist groups in the subnational policy work and ways to deal with both policy bureaucrats and local citizens. Particularly, the paper intends to answer following questions: In what way might NGOs at this level be considered to have expertise and how their expertise is being constructed? Czech institutionalized NGOs generally do not have a broad membership base; hence their legitimacy does not result from active membership. Rather they need to seek for different sources of legitimacy. Indeed, the access to and use of expertise and professionalization is of crucial importance. We explore the sources and methods NGOs use to identify, formulate and advocate their positions toward local policy makers and publ

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AO - Sociologie, demografie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GAP404%2F11%2F2098" target="_blank" >GAP404/11/2098: Trend zrychlování sociální dynamiky: neurčitost, hierarchické/rovné struktury vládnutí a interiorizace historií</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Policy and Society

ISSN

1449-4035

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

33

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

AU - Austrálie

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

129-139

Kód UT WoS článku

000338003500005

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—