Regulating New Psychoactive Substances in the Czech Republic: Policy Analysis under Urgency

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F15%3A10294877" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/15:10294877 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy.is.cuni.cz/doi/full/10.1080/13876988.2014.979553" target="_blank" >http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy.is.cuni.cz/doi/full/10.1080/13876988.2014.979553</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2014.979553" target="_blank" >10.1080/13876988.2014.979553</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Regulating New Psychoactive Substances in the Czech Republic: Policy Analysis under Urgency

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The criminal prohibition of psychoactive substances is challenged every day as new designer substances emerge on globalized markets in a regulatory void. In a case study of a recent regulatory amendment in the Czech Republic, the article reconstructs theformulation of recommendations by an advisory committee working at the boundary between science and practical policy making. A uniform legal status was applied to both high-risk and low-risk substances. The article demonstrates how expert efforts to produce evidence-based policy advice were constrained by an externally induced sense of urgency, avoidance of controversy, internal disunity about drug policy orientation, limited evidence, and the institutional momentum of traditional drug control. The logic of evidence was relativized by the tactical preference for consensus.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Regulating New Psychoactive Substances in the Czech Republic: Policy Analysis under Urgency

Popis výsledku anglicky

The criminal prohibition of psychoactive substances is challenged every day as new designer substances emerge on globalized markets in a regulatory void. In a case study of a recent regulatory amendment in the Czech Republic, the article reconstructs theformulation of recommendations by an advisory committee working at the boundary between science and practical policy making. A uniform legal status was applied to both high-risk and low-risk substances. The article demonstrates how expert efforts to produce evidence-based policy advice were constrained by an externally induced sense of urgency, avoidance of controversy, internal disunity about drug policy orientation, limited evidence, and the institutional momentum of traditional drug control. The logic of evidence was relativized by the tactical preference for consensus.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GAP404%2F12%2F0725" target="_blank" >GAP404/12/0725: Analytici politiky v ústřední státní správě České republiky: praktiky, profesní hodnoty a identita</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice

ISSN

1387-6988

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

17

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

229-246

Kód UT WoS článku

000355737900003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84930754137