Avoiding Paralysis: The Eastern Enlargement and the Council of the European Union

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F15%3A10297827" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/15:10297827 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2015.1034276" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2015.1034276</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2015.1034276" target="_blank" >10.1080/07036337.2015.1034276</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Avoiding Paralysis: The Eastern Enlargement and the Council of the European Union

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Why does the Council of the European Union continue to function without apparent problems, despite the increase in the number and heterogeneity of its members brought about by the Eastern enlargement? We argue that the reason why the Council has not become paralysed lies in the increased delegation of its agenda load from the ministerial meetings downwards to the Committee of Permanent Representatives (Coreper). We assess our argument on the basis of quantitative analysis of the amount of the so-calledA-points (decided by Coreper) and B-points (decided by ministers) on the Council agenda in the years 2000 through 2007. Studying the delegation mechanism deeper, we argue that two design features of Coreper its permanent nature and its broad scope of agenda coverage enabled the delegation from ministerial meetings to take place and thus helped the Council cope with the larger and more heterogeneous membership.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Avoiding Paralysis: The Eastern Enlargement and the Council of the European Union

Popis výsledku anglicky

Why does the Council of the European Union continue to function without apparent problems, despite the increase in the number and heterogeneity of its members brought about by the Eastern enlargement? We argue that the reason why the Council has not become paralysed lies in the increased delegation of its agenda load from the ministerial meetings downwards to the Committee of Permanent Representatives (Coreper). We assess our argument on the basis of quantitative analysis of the amount of the so-calledA-points (decided by Coreper) and B-points (decided by ministers) on the Council agenda in the years 2000 through 2007. Studying the delegation mechanism deeper, we argue that two design features of Coreper its permanent nature and its broad scope of agenda coverage enabled the delegation from ministerial meetings to take place and thus helped the Council cope with the larger and more heterogeneous membership.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA407%2F09%2F1747" target="_blank" >GA407/09/1747: Východní rozšíření a vzorce rozhodování v Evropské unii</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of European Integration

ISSN

0703-6337

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

37

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

649-665

Kód UT WoS článku

000357832000003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84936985520