Does the Lowest Bid Price Evaluation Criterion Make for a More Efficient Public Procurement Selection Criterion? (Case of the Czech Republic)
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F15%3A10306860" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/15:10306860 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61384399:31110/15:00046803
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2015-0003" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2015-0003</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2015-0003" target="_blank" >10.1515/nispa-2015-0003</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Does the Lowest Bid Price Evaluation Criterion Make for a More Efficient Public Procurement Selection Criterion? (Case of the Czech Republic)
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Through the institute of public procurement is allocated a considerable volume of financial resources. It is therefore in the interest of contracting entities to seek ways of how to achieve an efficient allocation of resources. Some public contract awarding entities along with some public administration authorities in the Czech Republic believe that the use of a single evaluation criterion (the lowest bid price) results in a more efficient tender for a public contract. It was found that contracting entities in the Czech Republic strongly prefer to use the lowest bid price criterion. Within the examined sample, 86.5% of public procurements were evaluated this way. Analysis of the examined sample of public contracts proved that the choice of an evaluation criterion, even preference of the lowest bid price criterion, does not have any obvious impact on the final cost of a public contract. The study concludes that preferring the criterion of the lowest bid price within evaluation of public
Název v anglickém jazyce
Does the Lowest Bid Price Evaluation Criterion Make for a More Efficient Public Procurement Selection Criterion? (Case of the Czech Republic)
Popis výsledku anglicky
Through the institute of public procurement is allocated a considerable volume of financial resources. It is therefore in the interest of contracting entities to seek ways of how to achieve an efficient allocation of resources. Some public contract awarding entities along with some public administration authorities in the Czech Republic believe that the use of a single evaluation criterion (the lowest bid price) results in a more efficient tender for a public contract. It was found that contracting entities in the Czech Republic strongly prefer to use the lowest bid price criterion. Within the examined sample, 86.5% of public procurements were evaluated this way. Analysis of the examined sample of public contracts proved that the choice of an evaluation criterion, even preference of the lowest bid price criterion, does not have any obvious impact on the final cost of a public contract. The study concludes that preferring the criterion of the lowest bid price within evaluation of public
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
ISSN
1337-9038
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
8
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
19
Strana od-do
41-59
Kód UT WoS článku
000360010800003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-84938558688