Implementation of transport infrastructure PPPs in the Czech Republic, Finland, Poland and Slovakia - a comparative analysis on national contexts

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F15%3A10312212" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/15:10312212 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJMNE.2015.073916" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJMNE.2015.073916</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJMNE.2015.073916" target="_blank" >10.1504/IJMNE.2015.073916</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Implementation of transport infrastructure PPPs in the Czech Republic, Finland, Poland and Slovakia - a comparative analysis on national contexts

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Although the concept of public-private partnership has been adopted in most countries in the world, relatively little attention has been paid to the ways PPP has been implemented and how the national political, legislative and administrative context affect the success of public-private partnerships. This paper compares the PPP experience of the three post-communist countries - the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland - with that of Finland. It shows that although PPP was equally alien to the countries' political and administrative systems, Finland has managed to implement PPPs without any serious problems while in the three transitive countries the same process produced numerous major failures and controversies. Several factors behind this contrast areidentified including political and institutional stability, different nature of regulatory frameworks and established managerial practices. In the end, important lessons are drawn from the cases for both the most developed and transitive

Název v anglickém jazyce

Implementation of transport infrastructure PPPs in the Czech Republic, Finland, Poland and Slovakia - a comparative analysis on national contexts

Popis výsledku anglicky

Although the concept of public-private partnership has been adopted in most countries in the world, relatively little attention has been paid to the ways PPP has been implemented and how the national political, legislative and administrative context affect the success of public-private partnerships. This paper compares the PPP experience of the three post-communist countries - the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland - with that of Finland. It shows that although PPP was equally alien to the countries' political and administrative systems, Finland has managed to implement PPPs without any serious problems while in the three transitive countries the same process produced numerous major failures and controversies. Several factors behind this contrast areidentified including political and institutional stability, different nature of regulatory frameworks and established managerial practices. In the end, important lessons are drawn from the cases for both the most developed and transitive

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Journal of Management and Network Economics

ISSN

1754-2316

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

3

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

220-237

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—