Who Has had the Main Say in the Path of the Czech Pension Reform: Politicians, Experts - or Both?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F16%3A10316035" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/16:10316035 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Who Has had the Main Say in the Path of the Czech Pension Reform: Politicians, Experts - or Both?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Although pension systems are among the most stable elements of social systems, even they evolve. In recent decades, dozens of countries have joined in by enacting minor adjustments or significant reforms. Politicians as well as invited experts have been paying close attention to the topic. In this paper, we analyze the framework of the spirit and content of the discourse of the Czech pension reform between 2004 and 2014 with the aid of discursive institutionalism theory and methods of framing analysis. The center of our focus is one the institutional framework and the content of the communication of its key experts while providing them the opportunity to exercise their professional duties and knowledge in the decision-making process, the politicians, themselves, ultimately have the final word.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Who Has had the Main Say in the Path of the Czech Pension Reform: Politicians, Experts - or Both?
Popis výsledku anglicky
Although pension systems are among the most stable elements of social systems, even they evolve. In recent decades, dozens of countries have joined in by enacting minor adjustments or significant reforms. Politicians as well as invited experts have been paying close attention to the topic. In this paper, we analyze the framework of the spirit and content of the discourse of the Czech pension reform between 2004 and 2014 with the aid of discursive institutionalism theory and methods of framing analysis. The center of our focus is one the institutional framework and the content of the communication of its key experts while providing them the opportunity to exercise their professional duties and knowledge in the decision-making process, the politicians, themselves, ultimately have the final word.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
AD - Politologie a politické vědy
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Current Trends in Public Sector Research : Proceedings of the 20th International Conference
ISBN
978-80-210-8082-9
ISSN
2336-1239
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
179-186
Název nakladatele
Masaryk University
Místo vydání
Brno
Místo konání akce
Šlapanice
Datum konání akce
21. 1. 2016
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000379382400022