A Perfect Counterinsurgency? Making Sense of Moscow's Policy of Chechenisation

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F16%3A10328173" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/16:10328173 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2016.1230842" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2016.1230842</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2016.1230842" target="_blank" >10.1080/09668136.2016.1230842</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A Perfect Counterinsurgency? Making Sense of Moscow's Policy of Chechenisation

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article assesses the successes and setbacks of Moscow's policy of counterinsurgency and beyond. It challenges the general consensus in scholarship positing that military successes associated with Chechenisation have been obtained against the backdrop of Chechnya's increasingly autonomous status within Russia, considered by some as a case of 'systemic separatism'. The article tracks how four key mechanisms (Chechnya's institutional design, internal opposition to the Kadyrov clan, the tradition of blood feud among kadyrovtsy-initially Chechen paramilitary forces named after both Kadyrovs, gradually transformed into seemingly regular Ministry of Interior (MVD) units-and Chechnya's economic dependency on Moscow) have enabled Moscow to maintain control over Chechnya while simultaneously allowing its elites to consolidate power within the republic. (C) 2016 University of Glasgow.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A Perfect Counterinsurgency? Making Sense of Moscow's Policy of Chechenisation

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article assesses the successes and setbacks of Moscow's policy of counterinsurgency and beyond. It challenges the general consensus in scholarship positing that military successes associated with Chechenisation have been obtained against the backdrop of Chechnya's increasingly autonomous status within Russia, considered by some as a case of 'systemic separatism'. The article tracks how four key mechanisms (Chechnya's institutional design, internal opposition to the Kadyrov clan, the tradition of blood feud among kadyrovtsy-initially Chechen paramilitary forces named after both Kadyrovs, gradually transformed into seemingly regular Ministry of Interior (MVD) units-and Chechnya's economic dependency on Moscow) have enabled Moscow to maintain control over Chechnya while simultaneously allowing its elites to consolidate power within the republic. (C) 2016 University of Glasgow.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Europe-Asia Studies

ISSN

0966-8136

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

68

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

8

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

28

Strana od-do

1287-1314

Kód UT WoS článku

000387763300001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84992699464