Empires of Conquest and Civilization in Georgian Political and Intellectual Discourse since Late Nineteenth Century
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F16%3A10363687" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/16:10363687 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v2i2.185" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v2i2.185</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v2i2.185" target="_blank" >10.17356/ieejsp.v2i2.185</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Empires of Conquest and Civilization in Georgian Political and Intellectual Discourse since Late Nineteenth Century
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article explores understandings of the concept of empire in Georgian political intellectual discourses in the pre-Soviet, Soviet and post-Soviet Georgian contexts. Beginning with an elaboration of contemporary political and scholarly understanding of empire, the article then - drawing on the approaches of intellectual and transnational history - distils two meanings: empire of conquest and of civilisation. Both meanings are mainly attributed to the Russian State in its political incarnations as an empire, as the fulcrum of the Soviet Union and more recently as an entity in search of a Eurasian Union. The article argues that while for most of the nineteenth century, the concept of empire embodied by the Russia state was invested with both meanings, particularly by the end of the Soviet period, it came to be singularised to that of conquest. More generally, it suggests that while in contemporary international relations empire, as a political entity, remains discredited morally and legally, the Neo-Gramscian concept of hegemony in IR scholarship elucidates why and when some hegemonic states act as empires of conquest, and while some others can do both, thus mustering their 'structural power' as well as 'soft power'.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Empires of Conquest and Civilization in Georgian Political and Intellectual Discourse since Late Nineteenth Century
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article explores understandings of the concept of empire in Georgian political intellectual discourses in the pre-Soviet, Soviet and post-Soviet Georgian contexts. Beginning with an elaboration of contemporary political and scholarly understanding of empire, the article then - drawing on the approaches of intellectual and transnational history - distils two meanings: empire of conquest and of civilisation. Both meanings are mainly attributed to the Russian State in its political incarnations as an empire, as the fulcrum of the Soviet Union and more recently as an entity in search of a Eurasian Union. The article argues that while for most of the nineteenth century, the concept of empire embodied by the Russia state was invested with both meanings, particularly by the end of the Soviet period, it came to be singularised to that of conquest. More generally, it suggests that while in contemporary international relations empire, as a political entity, remains discredited morally and legally, the Neo-Gramscian concept of hegemony in IR scholarship elucidates why and when some hegemonic states act as empires of conquest, and while some others can do both, thus mustering their 'structural power' as well as 'soft power'.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
INTERSECTIONS-EAST EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIETY AND POLITICS
ISSN
2416-089X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
HU - Maďarsko
Počet stran výsledku
20
Strana od-do
104-123
Kód UT WoS článku
000407648900007
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—