Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Empires of Conquest and Civilization in Georgian Political and Intellectual Discourse since Late Nineteenth Century

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F16%3A10363687" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/16:10363687 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v2i2.185" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v2i2.185</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v2i2.185" target="_blank" >10.17356/ieejsp.v2i2.185</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Empires of Conquest and Civilization in Georgian Political and Intellectual Discourse since Late Nineteenth Century

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    This article explores understandings of the concept of empire in Georgian political intellectual discourses in the pre-Soviet, Soviet and post-Soviet Georgian contexts. Beginning with an elaboration of contemporary political and scholarly understanding of empire, the article then - drawing on the approaches of intellectual and transnational history - distils two meanings: empire of conquest and of civilisation. Both meanings are mainly attributed to the Russian State in its political incarnations as an empire, as the fulcrum of the Soviet Union and more recently as an entity in search of a Eurasian Union. The article argues that while for most of the nineteenth century, the concept of empire embodied by the Russia state was invested with both meanings, particularly by the end of the Soviet period, it came to be singularised to that of conquest. More generally, it suggests that while in contemporary international relations empire, as a political entity, remains discredited morally and legally, the Neo-Gramscian concept of hegemony in IR scholarship elucidates why and when some hegemonic states act as empires of conquest, and while some others can do both, thus mustering their &apos;structural power&apos; as well as &apos;soft power&apos;.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Empires of Conquest and Civilization in Georgian Political and Intellectual Discourse since Late Nineteenth Century

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    This article explores understandings of the concept of empire in Georgian political intellectual discourses in the pre-Soviet, Soviet and post-Soviet Georgian contexts. Beginning with an elaboration of contemporary political and scholarly understanding of empire, the article then - drawing on the approaches of intellectual and transnational history - distils two meanings: empire of conquest and of civilisation. Both meanings are mainly attributed to the Russian State in its political incarnations as an empire, as the fulcrum of the Soviet Union and more recently as an entity in search of a Eurasian Union. The article argues that while for most of the nineteenth century, the concept of empire embodied by the Russia state was invested with both meanings, particularly by the end of the Soviet period, it came to be singularised to that of conquest. More generally, it suggests that while in contemporary international relations empire, as a political entity, remains discredited morally and legally, the Neo-Gramscian concept of hegemony in IR scholarship elucidates why and when some hegemonic states act as empires of conquest, and while some others can do both, thus mustering their &apos;structural power&apos; as well as &apos;soft power&apos;.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50601 - Political science

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2016

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    INTERSECTIONS-EAST EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIETY AND POLITICS

  • ISSN

    2416-089X

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    2

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    2

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    HU - Maďarsko

  • Počet stran výsledku

    20

  • Strana od-do

    104-123

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000407648900007

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus