Building sovereigns? The UN peacekeeping and strengthening the authority of the state in Lebanon and Mali
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F17%3A10361698" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/17:10361698 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2017.1363172" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2017.1363172</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2017.1363172" target="_blank" >10.1080/14781158.2017.1363172</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Building sovereigns? The UN peacekeeping and strengthening the authority of the state in Lebanon and Mali
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper contributes to the debate on the recent 'stabilization turn' in United Nations (UN) peacekeeping by inquiring into a changing set of practices by which the UN intends to 'strengthen the authority of the state.' Drawing on Piiparinen's notion of sovereignty-building as an emerging paradigm of conflict management, the study analyses the support for state authority and sovereignty in two modalities of contemporary UN peace operations - UNIFIL II and MINUSMA. While the two analysed missions significantly differ when it comes to the extent of their tasks, or the rules for the use of force, they both highlight the importance of local politics and agency in the implementations of their mandates and the need to strike a compromise between the contending visions on what form of sovereignty should be supported. By doing so, the paper points out the importance of 'local' and contextual emergence of the practices of sovereignty-building.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Building sovereigns? The UN peacekeeping and strengthening the authority of the state in Lebanon and Mali
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper contributes to the debate on the recent 'stabilization turn' in United Nations (UN) peacekeeping by inquiring into a changing set of practices by which the UN intends to 'strengthen the authority of the state.' Drawing on Piiparinen's notion of sovereignty-building as an emerging paradigm of conflict management, the study analyses the support for state authority and sovereignty in two modalities of contemporary UN peace operations - UNIFIL II and MINUSMA. While the two analysed missions significantly differ when it comes to the extent of their tasks, or the rules for the use of force, they both highlight the importance of local politics and agency in the implementations of their mandates and the need to strike a compromise between the contending visions on what form of sovereignty should be supported. By doing so, the paper points out the importance of 'local' and contextual emergence of the practices of sovereignty-building.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Global Change, Peace and Security
ISSN
1478-1158
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
29
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
19
Strana od-do
229-247
Kód UT WoS článku
000415795300002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85028541731