Volební design, reformy a inženýrství v postjugoslávském prostoru 1990-2015

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F17%3A10363506" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/17:10363506 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.5817/CEPSR.2017.2.87" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5817/CEPSR.2017.2.87</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CEPSR.2017.2.87" target="_blank" >10.5817/CEPSR.2017.2.87</a>

Jazyk výsledku

čeština

Název v původním jazyce

Volební design, reformy a inženýrství v postjugoslávském prostoru 1990-2015

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article deals with the topic of electoral design, reforms, and engineering in the Post-Yugoslav state entities between 1990 and 2015. Firstly, it briefly conceptualizes theoretical framework (Katz, Shugart, Renwick). Secondly, it describes evolution of electoral design and reforms to the main chambers in particular systems in detail. Thirdly, it analyses and compares common trends in electoral reforms and design. PR list systems have been used for almost of 90% of all 60 elections (PR list had been adopted no later than in the fourth elections in all the systems). There have been 29 reforms in total (avg. 3.6 per entity), 1/5 of them major and 4/5 minor. Major reforms took place in the FRY and Serbia (one) and in Croatia and Macedonia (two). On contrary, there have been no major electoral reforms in Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo. Minor reforms have been present in all entities (the most in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Montenegro, the least in Kosovo and Slovenia). While major reforms were used mostly for corrections of parts of political systems perceived as dysfunctional, one third of minor reforms were used for intentional electoral engineering. Generally, electoral design can be considered as unstable and electoral reforms as very frequent in the Post-Yugoslav state entities (avg. every 4.7 year). All the systems also introduced specific approach to national minorities which facilitated their representation in the main chambers.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Electoral Design, Reforms and Engineering in the Post-Yugoslav State Entities 1990-2015

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article deals with the topic of electoral design, reforms, and engineering in the Post-Yugoslav state entities between 1990 and 2015. Firstly, it briefly conceptualizes theoretical framework (Katz, Shugart, Renwick). Secondly, it describes evolution of electoral design and reforms to the main chambers in particular systems in detail. Thirdly, it analyses and compares common trends in electoral reforms and design. PR list systems have been used for almost of 90% of all 60 elections (PR list had been adopted no later than in the fourth elections in all the systems). There have been 29 reforms in total (avg. 3.6 per entity), 1/5 of them major and 4/5 minor. Major reforms took place in the FRY and Serbia (one) and in Croatia and Macedonia (two). On contrary, there have been no major electoral reforms in Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo. Minor reforms have been present in all entities (the most in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Montenegro, the least in Kosovo and Slovenia). While major reforms were used mostly for corrections of parts of political systems perceived as dysfunctional, one third of minor reforms were used for intentional electoral engineering. Generally, electoral design can be considered as unstable and electoral reforms as very frequent in the Post-Yugoslav state entities (avg. every 4.7 year). All the systems also introduced specific approach to national minorities which facilitated their representation in the main chambers.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Středoevropské politické studie (Central European Political Studies Review.)

ISSN

1212-7817

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

19

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

48

Strana od-do

87-134

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—