Two post-war paths: popular violence in the Bohemian lands and in Austria in the aftermath of World War I

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F18%3A10364422" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/18:10364422 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2017.1354362" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2017.1354362</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2017.1354362" target="_blank" >10.1080/00905992.2017.1354362</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Two post-war paths: popular violence in the Bohemian lands and in Austria in the aftermath of World War I

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The study explores the phenomenon of popular violence in the first months and years after the end of World War I on the basis of a comparison between the Bohemian lands, forming the central part of the newly established Czechoslovakia, and Austria, as another successor state to the former Habsburg monarchy. Aside from the continuities, new forms of violence increasingly emerged in the first years after the end of the war, and also the &quot;language&quot; of violence was transformed. While in Czechoslovakia, the framework within which people were learning to understand the new world was shaped by the national and republican discourse oriented to the future, in Austria the collective identities and mentalities were being formed along the lines of particular party political blocks. In both cases, the nationalization and politicization of violence respectively contributed to the emergence of new forms of popular violence; but at the same time they could also be used for its de-escalation, necessary for the re-integration of society disrupted by the wartime experience. However, even if both countries went out from the war on different paths, the violence stayed part of their political culture and it could be mobilized again.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Two post-war paths: popular violence in the Bohemian lands and in Austria in the aftermath of World War I

Popis výsledku anglicky

The study explores the phenomenon of popular violence in the first months and years after the end of World War I on the basis of a comparison between the Bohemian lands, forming the central part of the newly established Czechoslovakia, and Austria, as another successor state to the former Habsburg monarchy. Aside from the continuities, new forms of violence increasingly emerged in the first years after the end of the war, and also the &quot;language&quot; of violence was transformed. While in Czechoslovakia, the framework within which people were learning to understand the new world was shaped by the national and republican discourse oriented to the future, in Austria the collective identities and mentalities were being formed along the lines of particular party political blocks. In both cases, the nationalization and politicization of violence respectively contributed to the emergence of new forms of popular violence; but at the same time they could also be used for its de-escalation, necessary for the re-integration of society disrupted by the wartime experience. However, even if both countries went out from the war on different paths, the violence stayed part of their political culture and it could be mobilized again.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA14-14612S" target="_blank" >GA14-14612S: Násilí ve střední Evropě za první světové války a v poválečné době. Srovnání rakouských a českých zemí</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Nationalities Papers

ISSN

0090-5992

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

46

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

759-775

Kód UT WoS článku

000445958500002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85032495925