The use of local direct democracy in the Czech Republic: how NIMBY disputes drive protest behaviour
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F18%3A10370880" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/18:10370880 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1433661" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1433661</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1433661" target="_blank" >10.1080/03003930.2018.1433661</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The use of local direct democracy in the Czech Republic: how NIMBY disputes drive protest behaviour
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Over the past 15 years there has been an increase in the use of local direct democracy in the Czech Republic. The analysis shows that the primary cause has been the regulation of development projects. Using transaction costs economics (TCE) approach it is shown how the regulation related to the siting of development projects leads to a not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) response resulting in political activism that uses institutions of local direct democracy. Drawing from the TCE perspective, in this article it is argued that the key sources of this political mobilisation have been the existence of contractual hazards related to development projects and an inability to form credible commitments between developers and communities. The article highlights a previously neglected explanation for the increased use of direct democracy because sources outside the political system often go unnoticed and contributes to the research on NIMBY disputes and on the expansion of direct democracy.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The use of local direct democracy in the Czech Republic: how NIMBY disputes drive protest behaviour
Popis výsledku anglicky
Over the past 15 years there has been an increase in the use of local direct democracy in the Czech Republic. The analysis shows that the primary cause has been the regulation of development projects. Using transaction costs economics (TCE) approach it is shown how the regulation related to the siting of development projects leads to a not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) response resulting in political activism that uses institutions of local direct democracy. Drawing from the TCE perspective, in this article it is argued that the key sources of this political mobilisation have been the existence of contractual hazards related to development projects and an inability to form credible commitments between developers and communities. The article highlights a previously neglected explanation for the increased use of direct democracy because sources outside the political system often go unnoticed and contributes to the research on NIMBY disputes and on the expansion of direct democracy.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50602 - Public administration
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA16-20553S" target="_blank" >GA16-20553S: Narativizace krize a instituce ve stranické politice (politics) a veřejných politikách (public policy)</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Local Government Studies
ISSN
0300-3930
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
44
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
21
Strana od-do
329-349
Kód UT WoS článku
000435698700002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85041601579