Theorizing international security regimes: a power-analytical approach

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F18%3A10376176" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/18:10376176 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0084-2" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0084-2</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0084-2" target="_blank" >10.1057/s41311-017-0084-2</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Theorizing international security regimes: a power-analytical approach

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article seeks to develop alternative ways to conceptually grasp international prohibition/regulatory regimes. It attempts to go beyond existing, and piecemeal, analysis of regimes within the intellectual field of IR based on conventional grand/mid-range theorization. It is argued that traditional theorization of regimes fashioned as IR theory has hindered, rather than helped, to understand regimes in their complexities, vagaries, and in terms of various forces simultaneously involved. The article answers a question of how to strike a balance between theoretical eclecticism, which is believed to be vital for a comprehensive analysis of security regimes, and the need to have a uniting device to organize such research.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Theorizing international security regimes: a power-analytical approach

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article seeks to develop alternative ways to conceptually grasp international prohibition/regulatory regimes. It attempts to go beyond existing, and piecemeal, analysis of regimes within the intellectual field of IR based on conventional grand/mid-range theorization. It is argued that traditional theorization of regimes fashioned as IR theory has hindered, rather than helped, to understand regimes in their complexities, vagaries, and in terms of various forces simultaneously involved. The article answers a question of how to strike a balance between theoretical eclecticism, which is believed to be vital for a comprehensive analysis of security regimes, and the need to have a uniting device to organize such research.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Politics

ISSN

1384-5748

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

55

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3-4

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

352-368

Kód UT WoS článku

000445907200002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85031502005