Constitutional Mobilization and Contestation in the Transnational Sphere

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F18%3A10376940" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/18:10376940 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12103" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12103</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jols.12103" target="_blank" >10.1111/jols.12103</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Constitutional Mobilization and Contestation in the Transnational Sphere

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The debate on the constitutionalization of European and transnational law pays little attention to the role of civil society and social movements. While civil society involvement in private litigation increasingly receives attention, the critical, counter-democratic role of transnational movements in a broader, public sense, is largely ignored. The significance of democratic claim making, public demands, and contestation, and the normative dimensions as well as constitutional implications of such engagement, are insufficiently explored. This article discusses the theoretical and analytical dimensions of legal and constitutional mobilization and explores different forms of civil society action before considering a plurality of legal rationalities as articulated in public claims, as well as the issue of counter-hegemonic struggle. Then, it develops a political-sociological approach, which, in the final part, is used in a case-study of the water rights campaign, exploring the different types of legal mobilization involved (including the European Citizens&apos; Initiative) and a variety of normative claims being endorsed.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Constitutional Mobilization and Contestation in the Transnational Sphere

Popis výsledku anglicky

The debate on the constitutionalization of European and transnational law pays little attention to the role of civil society and social movements. While civil society involvement in private litigation increasingly receives attention, the critical, counter-democratic role of transnational movements in a broader, public sense, is largely ignored. The significance of democratic claim making, public demands, and contestation, and the normative dimensions as well as constitutional implications of such engagement, are insufficiently explored. This article discusses the theoretical and analytical dimensions of legal and constitutional mobilization and explores different forms of civil society action before considering a plurality of legal rationalities as articulated in public claims, as well as the issue of counter-hegemonic struggle. Then, it develops a political-sociological approach, which, in the final part, is used in a case-study of the water rights campaign, exploring the different types of legal mobilization involved (including the European Citizens&apos; Initiative) and a variety of normative claims being endorsed.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50401 - Sociology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA18-25924S" target="_blank" >GA18-25924S: Transnacionální populismus a evropská demokracie</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Law and Society

ISSN

0263-323X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

45

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Supplement 1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

"S52"-"S72"

Kód UT WoS článku

000439549500004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85050400340