Understanding Policy Failure and Policy Success: the Czech Republic Perspective
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F18%3A10379359" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/18:10379359 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Understanding Policy Failure and Policy Success: the Czech Republic Perspective
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper deals with evaluation of public policies, as well as the criteria upon which we can evaluate them as failing or successful. Such an analysis of a policy success and policy failure is not easy. In literature, we cannot find an established and unified definition of the above and only one approach to policy evaluation is not prevalent. Our viewpoint is based on two approaches to analysis of policy success and policy failure. We work on the theoretical assumption of two dimensions for the evaluation of policy success and policy failure - program and politics, by Mark Bovens and Paul 't Hart. Secondly, we based this article on the work of Allan McConnell and his presumption of three dimensions - process, program and politics. The goal of the paper is to explore and discover whether this theoretical background is sufficient with the aim to refine it (especially in the context of the Czech Republic). Our methodology approach is based on the above-mentioned theoretical bases and in-depth semi-structured interviews with Czech experts, policymakers and bureaucrats and their perception of policy failure or success.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Understanding Policy Failure and Policy Success: the Czech Republic Perspective
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper deals with evaluation of public policies, as well as the criteria upon which we can evaluate them as failing or successful. Such an analysis of a policy success and policy failure is not easy. In literature, we cannot find an established and unified definition of the above and only one approach to policy evaluation is not prevalent. Our viewpoint is based on two approaches to analysis of policy success and policy failure. We work on the theoretical assumption of two dimensions for the evaluation of policy success and policy failure - program and politics, by Mark Bovens and Paul 't Hart. Secondly, we based this article on the work of Allan McConnell and his presumption of three dimensions - process, program and politics. The goal of the paper is to explore and discover whether this theoretical background is sufficient with the aim to refine it (especially in the context of the Czech Republic). Our methodology approach is based on the above-mentioned theoretical bases and in-depth semi-structured interviews with Czech experts, policymakers and bureaucrats and their perception of policy failure or success.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50602 - Public administration
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Current Trends in Public Sector Research
ISBN
978-80-210-8923-5
ISSN
2336-1239
e-ISSN
neuvedeno
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
252-259
Název nakladatele
Masarykova Universita
Místo vydání
Brno
Místo konání akce
Brno - Šlapanice
Datum konání akce
18. 1. 2018
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—