A Nuclear Posture Review for the Third Nuclear Age: Patterns of Continuity and Change
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F18%3A10380369" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/18:10380369 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2018.1520554" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2018.1520554</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2018.1520554" target="_blank" >10.1080/0163660X.2018.1520554</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
A Nuclear Posture Review for the Third Nuclear Age: Patterns of Continuity and Change
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In 1996, renowned U.S. defense expert Fred Iklé proposed that the nuclear drama of the past decades had entered its more volatile second act. Soon after, the term "second nuclear age" began to be widely used among nuclear strategists. Unlike the first age, marked by bipolar competition with the Soviet Union, the main challenge of the second age would come from belligerent regional powers equipped with weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and ballistic missile technology. However, this era was not thought to last forever-for Professor Colin Gray, even in 1996, wrote the "second nuclear age can be seen as a period of interregnum between irregular cyclical surges in the kind of great power rivalry that organizes many strands in the course of strategic history."
Název v anglickém jazyce
A Nuclear Posture Review for the Third Nuclear Age: Patterns of Continuity and Change
Popis výsledku anglicky
In 1996, renowned U.S. defense expert Fred Iklé proposed that the nuclear drama of the past decades had entered its more volatile second act. Soon after, the term "second nuclear age" began to be widely used among nuclear strategists. Unlike the first age, marked by bipolar competition with the Soviet Union, the main challenge of the second age would come from belligerent regional powers equipped with weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and ballistic missile technology. However, this era was not thought to last forever-for Professor Colin Gray, even in 1996, wrote the "second nuclear age can be seen as a period of interregnum between irregular cyclical surges in the kind of great power rivalry that organizes many strands in the course of strategic history."
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
The Washington Quarterly
ISSN
0163-660X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
41
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
21
Strana od-do
137-157
Kód UT WoS článku
000445878300007
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85054192870