Between NATO and a hard place: defence spending debate in Germany and Czechia

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F19%3A10394734" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/19:10394734 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=UoMgCmc8Pg" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=UoMgCmc8Pg</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2019.1617276" target="_blank" >10.1080/09662839.2019.1617276</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Between NATO and a hard place: defence spending debate in Germany and Czechia

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Defence spending has become a primary issue in the context of NATO. The question of fair burden-sharing and development of new capabilities in reaction to the changing security environment led NATO members to aim to spend 2% of GDP on defence by 2024. While some allies have managed to reach the level quickly, others seem not to be able or willing to do so. We know little, however, how the international commitment is reflected and referred to in individual member states. This article shows how size played a role when the 2% pledge was discussed in domestic politics, even if the resulting policy may be very similar. Based on expert and political debates in Germany and Czechia, it demonstrates that external expectations and the question of status play a crucial part in the small state&apos;s reasoning whereas it is mainly internal drivers that shape the big state&apos;s decisions.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Between NATO and a hard place: defence spending debate in Germany and Czechia

Popis výsledku anglicky

Defence spending has become a primary issue in the context of NATO. The question of fair burden-sharing and development of new capabilities in reaction to the changing security environment led NATO members to aim to spend 2% of GDP on defence by 2024. While some allies have managed to reach the level quickly, others seem not to be able or willing to do so. We know little, however, how the international commitment is reflected and referred to in individual member states. This article shows how size played a role when the 2% pledge was discussed in domestic politics, even if the resulting policy may be very similar. Based on expert and political debates in Germany and Czechia, it demonstrates that external expectations and the question of status play a crucial part in the small state&apos;s reasoning whereas it is mainly internal drivers that shape the big state&apos;s decisions.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50701 - Cultural and economic geography

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA17-05581S" target="_blank" >GA17-05581S: Pod tlakem internacionalizace a sekuritizace: Proměny bezpečnostní politiky evropských států</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Security

ISSN

0966-2839

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

28

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

193-211

Kód UT WoS článku

000473828800004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—