Sociology of constitutional law and politics

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F20%3A10432968" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/20:10432968 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789905182.00027" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789905182.00027</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781789905182.00027" target="_blank" >10.4337/9781789905182.00027</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Sociology of constitutional law and politics

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Constitutions and constitutionalism are increasingly important objects of inquiry for sociologists. Traditionally, and to some extent true even today, sociology has tended to show little interest in constitutions or constitutionalism, even if early sociological and philosophical works proposed some form of theory of constitutional legitimacy. By the 1980s, a certain revival of sociological interest in constitutions can be discerned. This is not least due to the fact that in the latter half of the 20th century, constitutions and constitutionalism became a core dimension of any modern society, that is, a distinctive understanding and implementation of constitutionalism forms now a standard way of social and political organization. Sociologists have been applying various and diverse approaches to study this emergence of and heightened significance of legal constitutionalism and judicialization. The chapter discusses a number of the most prominent approaches, ranging from Luhmannian perspectives, Bourdieusian analyses, critical-theoretical works, conflict-theoretical endeavours, to cultural approaches. The chapter first discusses the most significant sociological approaches regarding the analysis of constitutions, and subsequently briefly engages with their conception of politics.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Sociology of constitutional law and politics

Popis výsledku anglicky

Constitutions and constitutionalism are increasingly important objects of inquiry for sociologists. Traditionally, and to some extent true even today, sociology has tended to show little interest in constitutions or constitutionalism, even if early sociological and philosophical works proposed some form of theory of constitutional legitimacy. By the 1980s, a certain revival of sociological interest in constitutions can be discerned. This is not least due to the fact that in the latter half of the 20th century, constitutions and constitutionalism became a core dimension of any modern society, that is, a distinctive understanding and implementation of constitutionalism forms now a standard way of social and political organization. Sociologists have been applying various and diverse approaches to study this emergence of and heightened significance of legal constitutionalism and judicialization. The chapter discusses a number of the most prominent approaches, ranging from Luhmannian perspectives, Bourdieusian analyses, critical-theoretical works, conflict-theoretical endeavours, to cultural approaches. The chapter first discusses the most significant sociological approaches regarding the analysis of constitutions, and subsequently briefly engages with their conception of politics.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50401 - Sociology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Research Handbook on the Sociology of Law

ISBN

978-1-78990-517-5

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

230-242

Počet stran knihy

416

Název nakladatele

Edward Elgar

Místo vydání

Cheltenham

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—