European Union and the fight against terrorism: a differentiated integration theory perspective

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F21%3A10415483" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/21:10415483 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=D1ZGwDApzO" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=D1ZGwDApzO</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10308-020-00590-3" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10308-020-00590-3</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

European Union and the fight against terrorism: a differentiated integration theory perspective

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Although many EU member states experienced large scale terrorist attacks and both national and EU policymakers have repeatedly acknowledged the need to tackle the apparent contradiction between borderless terrorism and national counterterrorism measures, a genuine supranational EU counterterrorism response has not emerged thus far. In this article, we explore why this has been the case. Via a set of proxy indicators, we operationalize and test three key variables derived from differentiated integration theory, which suggests that the lack of horizontal and vertical integration in the EU&apos;s counterterrorism policy ought to be the result of high and asymmetric politicization, asymmetrical interdependence, and little preference convergence across EU member states. Our findings indicate that although all of these variables did influence integration in the first fifteen years of EU counterterrorism policy (2001-2016), only one variable (interdependence) acted exactly as expected by differentiated integration theory. (C) 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Název v anglickém jazyce

European Union and the fight against terrorism: a differentiated integration theory perspective

Popis výsledku anglicky

Although many EU member states experienced large scale terrorist attacks and both national and EU policymakers have repeatedly acknowledged the need to tackle the apparent contradiction between borderless terrorism and national counterterrorism measures, a genuine supranational EU counterterrorism response has not emerged thus far. In this article, we explore why this has been the case. Via a set of proxy indicators, we operationalize and test three key variables derived from differentiated integration theory, which suggests that the lack of horizontal and vertical integration in the EU&apos;s counterterrorism policy ought to be the result of high and asymmetric politicization, asymmetrical interdependence, and little preference convergence across EU member states. Our findings indicate that although all of these variables did influence integration in the first fifteen years of EU counterterrorism policy (2001-2016), only one variable (interdependence) acted exactly as expected by differentiated integration theory. (C) 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Asia Europe Journal

ISSN

1610-2932

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

19

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

30

Strana od-do

75-104

Kód UT WoS článku

000571374600001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85091170532