Belarus as a liminal space for Russia's ontological security before and after the 2020 protests

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F21%3A10429780" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/21:10429780 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=cbrz39E2Xu" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=cbrz39E2Xu</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2336825X211032900" target="_blank" >10.1177/2336825X211032900</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Belarus as a liminal space for Russia's ontological security before and after the 2020 protests

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article uses the ontological security framework and the concept of liminality to analyze Belarus liminal status vis-a-vis Russia and the role it has played in Russia&apos;s ontological security seeking before and after the 2020 Belarus Awakening. It argues that while the entire near-abroad, and, in particular, Ukraine have been important in terms of Russia&apos;s post-imperial ontological security seeking strategies, Belarus occupies a unique position with respect to Russia&apos;s securitized identity because of its perfectly marginal or liminal status. This has to do with the fact that, in the Russian geopolitical gaze, Belarus has remained almost unseparated from the Russian Self. Furthermore, the 2020 protests challenged this status but did not entirely eliminate it, leading to a restructuration of Belarus&apos; liminality.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Belarus as a liminal space for Russia's ontological security before and after the 2020 protests

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article uses the ontological security framework and the concept of liminality to analyze Belarus liminal status vis-a-vis Russia and the role it has played in Russia&apos;s ontological security seeking before and after the 2020 Belarus Awakening. It argues that while the entire near-abroad, and, in particular, Ukraine have been important in terms of Russia&apos;s post-imperial ontological security seeking strategies, Belarus occupies a unique position with respect to Russia&apos;s securitized identity because of its perfectly marginal or liminal status. This has to do with the fact that, in the Russian geopolitical gaze, Belarus has remained almost unseparated from the Russian Self. Furthermore, the 2020 protests challenged this status but did not entirely eliminate it, leading to a restructuration of Belarus&apos; liminality.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

New Perspectives

ISSN

2336-825X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

29

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

23

Strana od-do

249-271

Kód UT WoS článku

000676859400001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85111039969