Democratic Erosion and Democratic Resilience in Central Europe during COVID-19

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F21%3A10434714" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/21:10434714 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=IORWDaeS2v" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=IORWDaeS2v</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.32422/mv-cjir.1818" target="_blank" >10.32422/mv-cjir.1818</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Democratic Erosion and Democratic Resilience in Central Europe during COVID-19

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

What are the effects of populists in power on democracy during a pandemic? The paper seeks to distinguish the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic can (not) be traced to democratic erosion and democratic resilience. Are the changes in the quality of democracy resulting from political leaders&apos; actions or rather a path-dependent continuation of previous trends? This contribution focuses on two paths - democratic erosion and democratic resilience - in the Visegrad Four countries (the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia), which are all governed by populist leaders. It builds on previous literature that focused principally on the first wave of the pandemic by focusing on institutional guardrails and accountability (vertical, horizontal, and diagonal) during the 18 months of the pandemic. It seeks to answer the following question: What conditions are necessary and sufficient to prevent democratic erosion?

Název v anglickém jazyce

Democratic Erosion and Democratic Resilience in Central Europe during COVID-19

Popis výsledku anglicky

What are the effects of populists in power on democracy during a pandemic? The paper seeks to distinguish the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic can (not) be traced to democratic erosion and democratic resilience. Are the changes in the quality of democracy resulting from political leaders&apos; actions or rather a path-dependent continuation of previous trends? This contribution focuses on two paths - democratic erosion and democratic resilience - in the Visegrad Four countries (the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia), which are all governed by populist leaders. It builds on previous literature that focused principally on the first wave of the pandemic by focusing on institutional guardrails and accountability (vertical, horizontal, and diagonal) during the 18 months of the pandemic. It seeks to answer the following question: What conditions are necessary and sufficient to prevent democratic erosion?

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Mezinárodní vztahy

ISSN

0323-1844

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

56

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

91-104

Kód UT WoS článku

000727653900004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85121910215