Civil Society Versus Local Self‐Governments and Central Government in V4 Countries: The Case of Co‐Creation
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F23%3A10454028" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/23:10454028 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216224:14560/23:00130244
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=yg6gcBQhXQ" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=yg6gcBQhXQ</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6282" target="_blank" >10.17645/pag.v11i2.6282</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Civil Society Versus Local Self‐Governments and Central Government in V4 Countries: The Case of Co‐Creation
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In the new EU member states, there are very few studies analyzing the role of central and local self-governments in co-design processes. Nevertheless, such studies are particularly important as co-creation takes place in the context of former post-communist countries where central power reigned supreme and cooperation with the civil sector was very limited. This article aims to enrich the existing debate on the role of central and local self-government in the context of co-creation at the local level-specifically to map the extent to which local and central governments in the Visegrad Four region (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia) support local participatory budgeting initiatives as one of the most important forms of co-creation. The findings are very interesting, as each country has its situation and specificities. The (positive but also negative) role of the central state is limited but not invisible, except in the Czech Republic. The relations between civil society (and formal NGOs) and local self-governments are somewhat more similar within the countries studied. At the beginning of participatory budgeting, the civil sector and NGOs served as initiators and local self-governments as followers. However, this position has been steadily shifting towards the dominance of local self-governments and the marginalization of the civil society's role.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Civil Society Versus Local Self‐Governments and Central Government in V4 Countries: The Case of Co‐Creation
Popis výsledku anglicky
In the new EU member states, there are very few studies analyzing the role of central and local self-governments in co-design processes. Nevertheless, such studies are particularly important as co-creation takes place in the context of former post-communist countries where central power reigned supreme and cooperation with the civil sector was very limited. This article aims to enrich the existing debate on the role of central and local self-government in the context of co-creation at the local level-specifically to map the extent to which local and central governments in the Visegrad Four region (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia) support local participatory budgeting initiatives as one of the most important forms of co-creation. The findings are very interesting, as each country has its situation and specificities. The (positive but also negative) role of the central state is limited but not invisible, except in the Czech Republic. The relations between civil society (and formal NGOs) and local self-governments are somewhat more similar within the countries studied. At the beginning of participatory budgeting, the civil sector and NGOs served as initiators and local self-governments as followers. However, this position has been steadily shifting towards the dominance of local self-governments and the marginalization of the civil society's role.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Politics and Governance
ISSN
2183-2463
e-ISSN
2183-2463
Svazek periodika
11
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
PT - Portugalská republika
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
293-304
Kód UT WoS článku
001013425200003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85161963277