Alliance Complements or Substitutes? Explaining Bilateral Intergovernmental Strategic Partnership Ties

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F23%3A10477455" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/23:10477455 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=tIkOh12NW2" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=tIkOh12NW2</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.32422/cjir.59" target="_blank" >10.32422/cjir.59</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Alliance Complements or Substitutes? Explaining Bilateral Intergovernmental Strategic Partnership Ties

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Since the end of the Cold War, informal security cooperation has been on the rise. Besides formal alliances, states are increasingly establishing so-called &quot;strategic partnerships&quot;. This new form of security cooperation is currently under-researched, although governments consider it an important foreign policy tool. We do not yet know whether security interests are the basis of these arrangements or whether strategic partnerships function as substitutes for or complements to formal alliances. This article addresses both issues by analyzing a new dataset on strategic partnerships with the involvement of G20 countries. I find that two or more states are most likely to be tied by partnerships when the presence of a common threat coincides with the absence of their joint membership in a formal alliance. However, states parties to a formal alliance with a lower commitment, such as a consultation, neutrality, or non-aggression pact, are also likely to be tied to each other by partnerships when they face a common threat. (C) 2023, Institute of International Relations Prague. All rights reserved.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Alliance Complements or Substitutes? Explaining Bilateral Intergovernmental Strategic Partnership Ties

Popis výsledku anglicky

Since the end of the Cold War, informal security cooperation has been on the rise. Besides formal alliances, states are increasingly establishing so-called &quot;strategic partnerships&quot;. This new form of security cooperation is currently under-researched, although governments consider it an important foreign policy tool. We do not yet know whether security interests are the basis of these arrangements or whether strategic partnerships function as substitutes for or complements to formal alliances. This article addresses both issues by analyzing a new dataset on strategic partnerships with the involvement of G20 countries. I find that two or more states are most likely to be tied by partnerships when the presence of a common threat coincides with the absence of their joint membership in a formal alliance. However, states parties to a formal alliance with a lower commitment, such as a consultation, neutrality, or non-aggression pact, are also likely to be tied to each other by partnerships when they face a common threat. (C) 2023, Institute of International Relations Prague. All rights reserved.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Czech Journal of International Relations

ISSN

2788-2985

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

58

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

35

Strana od-do

7-41

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85179343022