U.S.-China Rivalry, Europe, and the Evolving Transatlantic Security Cooperation
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F24%3A10487254" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/24:10487254 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://isdp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/In-Defense-of-the-Liberal-International-Order-OneFile-16-February.pdf" target="_blank" >https://isdp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/In-Defense-of-the-Liberal-International-Order-OneFile-16-February.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
U.S.-China Rivalry, Europe, and the Evolving Transatlantic Security Cooperation
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The brief period at the turn of the millennium when the United States aspired to socialize China into becoming a "responsible stakeholder" within the Liberal International Order (LIO) has definitely passed. Today, even the "postmodern", confrontation-avoiding European Union is officially considering Beijing to be a "systemic rival". As a consequence of China's failed socialization, the transatlantic relationship has been balancing two countervailing tendencies. On the one hand, China's growing economic, military, political and technological clout is pulling the United States' focus toward the Indo-Pacific and out of Europe. On the other hand, for its IndoPacific pivot to be successful, the U.S. needs support from its European partners, who-especially in the context of Russian aggression in Ukraine-get uncomfortable when Washington speaks of rebalancing its resources toward Asia at the expense of European security. This particularly applies to Central and Eastern European (CEE) states, who will tend to increasingly "make themselves useful" for Washington in exchange for its continuing attention and security pledges to the region.3 These tendencies are expected to cause tensions between the core Western EU member-states and the CEE and within the transatlantic partnership itself-this loss of cohesion would ultimately benefit the actor that is causing the said developments, China. Bridging these rifts is a transatlantic challenge likely to be resolved by the traditional mechanism-the operationalization of values.
Název v anglickém jazyce
U.S.-China Rivalry, Europe, and the Evolving Transatlantic Security Cooperation
Popis výsledku anglicky
The brief period at the turn of the millennium when the United States aspired to socialize China into becoming a "responsible stakeholder" within the Liberal International Order (LIO) has definitely passed. Today, even the "postmodern", confrontation-avoiding European Union is officially considering Beijing to be a "systemic rival". As a consequence of China's failed socialization, the transatlantic relationship has been balancing two countervailing tendencies. On the one hand, China's growing economic, military, political and technological clout is pulling the United States' focus toward the Indo-Pacific and out of Europe. On the other hand, for its IndoPacific pivot to be successful, the U.S. needs support from its European partners, who-especially in the context of Russian aggression in Ukraine-get uncomfortable when Washington speaks of rebalancing its resources toward Asia at the expense of European security. This particularly applies to Central and Eastern European (CEE) states, who will tend to increasingly "make themselves useful" for Washington in exchange for its continuing attention and security pledges to the region.3 These tendencies are expected to cause tensions between the core Western EU member-states and the CEE and within the transatlantic partnership itself-this loss of cohesion would ultimately benefit the actor that is causing the said developments, China. Bridging these rifts is a transatlantic challenge likely to be resolved by the traditional mechanism-the operationalization of values.
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů