Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Institutionalization of the Czech and Luxembourgish Pirate Parties: a comparative perspective

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F25%3A10500071" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/25:10500071 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=uR2Tk4x-gE" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=uR2Tk4x-gE</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12286-025-00642-1" target="_blank" >10.1007/s12286-025-00642-1</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Institutionalization of the Czech and Luxembourgish Pirate Parties: a comparative perspective

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    This paper contributes to the debate on party institutionalization by including new parties that lack both connections with existing parties and social movement structures, thus unlikely adepts to institutionalize. To that end, we explore two parliamentary-represented Pirate Parties, from Czechia and Luxembourg, that fit these criteria.Utilizing original interviews with party elites to analyze the structural aspects of the internal party institutionalization. On the other hand, the article examines the external dimension of party institutionalization by focusing on voter loyalty and the party&apos;s role within the party system. Additionally, it looks at the objective durability entailing the ability to survive shocks.Our findings offer a comprehensive understanding of the degree of institutionalization of these two similarly successful parties. Particularly in the Czech case, the pragmatic focus on rules and regulations facilitated extensive base-level routinization. Together with early depersonalization and ability to survive shocks, such organizational setup resulted in a relatively high degree of institutionalization. In the Luxembourgish case, the focus on more developed intra-party democracy, together with lower coalition potential of the party associated with its anti-establishment image led to its lower capacity to institutionalize.In conclusion, we provide theory-guided explanations for the institutionalization of these cases. Despite lacking origin in social movement structure, having movement-style founders seems to help these parties to institutionalize. However, genetic imprints do not explain the whole picture, our findings underline the role of pragmatic party elites and learning from successful practices and mistakes of other parties for the ability to adapt and institutionalize.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Institutionalization of the Czech and Luxembourgish Pirate Parties: a comparative perspective

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    This paper contributes to the debate on party institutionalization by including new parties that lack both connections with existing parties and social movement structures, thus unlikely adepts to institutionalize. To that end, we explore two parliamentary-represented Pirate Parties, from Czechia and Luxembourg, that fit these criteria.Utilizing original interviews with party elites to analyze the structural aspects of the internal party institutionalization. On the other hand, the article examines the external dimension of party institutionalization by focusing on voter loyalty and the party&apos;s role within the party system. Additionally, it looks at the objective durability entailing the ability to survive shocks.Our findings offer a comprehensive understanding of the degree of institutionalization of these two similarly successful parties. Particularly in the Czech case, the pragmatic focus on rules and regulations facilitated extensive base-level routinization. Together with early depersonalization and ability to survive shocks, such organizational setup resulted in a relatively high degree of institutionalization. In the Luxembourgish case, the focus on more developed intra-party democracy, together with lower coalition potential of the party associated with its anti-establishment image led to its lower capacity to institutionalize.In conclusion, we provide theory-guided explanations for the institutionalization of these cases. Despite lacking origin in social movement structure, having movement-style founders seems to help these parties to institutionalize. However, genetic imprints do not explain the whole picture, our findings underline the role of pragmatic party elites and learning from successful practices and mistakes of other parties for the ability to adapt and institutionalize.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50601 - Political science

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/LX22NPO5101" target="_blank" >LX22NPO5101: Národní institut pro výzkum socioekonomických dopadů nemocí a systémových rizik</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft

  • ISSN

    1865-2646

  • e-ISSN

    1865-2654

  • Svazek periodika

    19

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    1

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    DE - Spolková republika Německo

  • Počet stran výsledku

    37

  • Strana od-do

    1-37

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001534372300001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-105011347881