Why Are We Still Technocrats? On the Sources of Technocratic Attitudes in the Post-Communist Region of CEE

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F25%3A10514749" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/25:10514749 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=g1QTFDz1yd" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=g1QTFDz1yd</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/SOC2025-41004" target="_blank" >10.5817/SOC2025-41004</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Why Are We Still Technocrats? On the Sources of Technocratic Attitudes in the Post-Communist Region of CEE

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim of this paper is to explore the sources of technocratic attitudes; that is, attitudes that support expert-driven governance. The aim is to focus on the post-communist countries of CEE, as support for technocracy in politics is higher in CEE compared to Western European countries. The analysis shows that people living in CEE countries see expert governance as compatible with democracy and also see it as a way to improve the functioning of democratic institutions. The results show a different pattern compared to Western European countries, where technocracy is perceived among the people as an alternative to democratic governance as such.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Why Are We Still Technocrats? On the Sources of Technocratic Attitudes in the Post-Communist Region of CEE

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim of this paper is to explore the sources of technocratic attitudes; that is, attitudes that support expert-driven governance. The aim is to focus on the post-communist countries of CEE, as support for technocracy in politics is higher in CEE compared to Western European countries. The analysis shows that people living in CEE countries see expert governance as compatible with democracy and also see it as a way to improve the functioning of democratic institutions. The results show a different pattern compared to Western European countries, where technocracy is perceived among the people as an alternative to democratic governance as such.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50401 - Sociology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Sociální studia

ISSN

1214-813X

e-ISSN

1803-6104

Svazek periodika

22

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

15-32

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105016117901