The fundamental imaginary dimension of the real in Merleau-Ponty's philosophy

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F15%3A10313265" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/15:10313265 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/67985955:_____/15:00434047

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341301" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341301</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341301" target="_blank" >10.1163/15691640-12341301</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The fundamental imaginary dimension of the real in Merleau-Ponty's philosophy

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The opposition between the imaginary and the real prevents us from understanding either one. The imaginary embodies a certain intuitive presence of the thing and not an empty signitive intention. Moreover it is able to compete with perception and to offer an increased presence, a sur-real display, of the things, as shown by Merleau-Ponty's analyses of art in Eye and Mind. As a result, we have to overcome the conception according to which the imaginary field is a mere figment of my imagination, a mentalentity that I could still possess in the very absence of its object. On the other hand, the presence of reality is never complete or solid: "The transcendence of the far-off encroaches upon my present and brings a hint of unreality even into the experiences with which I believe myself to coincide." Therefore, first, the imaginary has to be redefined as a special hovering modality of the presence of the beings themselves. Second: is not the imaginary always intertwined with perception? Me

Název v anglickém jazyce

The fundamental imaginary dimension of the real in Merleau-Ponty's philosophy

Popis výsledku anglicky

The opposition between the imaginary and the real prevents us from understanding either one. The imaginary embodies a certain intuitive presence of the thing and not an empty signitive intention. Moreover it is able to compete with perception and to offer an increased presence, a sur-real display, of the things, as shown by Merleau-Ponty's analyses of art in Eye and Mind. As a result, we have to overcome the conception according to which the imaginary field is a mere figment of my imagination, a mentalentity that I could still possess in the very absence of its object. On the other hand, the presence of reality is never complete or solid: "The transcendence of the far-off encroaches upon my present and brings a hint of unreality even into the experiences with which I believe myself to coincide." Therefore, first, the imaginary has to be redefined as a special hovering modality of the presence of the beings themselves. Second: is not the imaginary always intertwined with perception? Me

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA15-10832S" target="_blank" >GA15-10832S: Život a prostředí. Fenomenologické vztahy mezi subjektivitou a přirozeným světem</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Research in Phenomenology

ISSN

0085-5553

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

45

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

33-52

Kód UT WoS článku

000353667800002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84930889572