The Society of Individuals: How to Solve the Dilemma of Individualism and Holism in Historical Sociology

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F15%3A10316984" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/15:10316984 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2015.2" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2015.2</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2015.2" target="_blank" >10.14712/23363525.2015.2</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Society of Individuals: How to Solve the Dilemma of Individualism and Holism in Historical Sociology

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

One of the questions that Norbert Elias tries to resolve in his work - either explicitly or implicitly - is the issue of the relationship between the individual and society. Elias critically assesses two approaches to this issue that sociology offered inhis time, namely the Weberian conception of individualism that postulates the human individual as the starting point of sociological thought, and the Durkheimian conception of holism, which considered society as a whole as the starting point, giving regard to holistic, supra-individual social facts. Elias considers both of these solutions one-sided and unsatisfactory, and in his conception tries to supercede them. His strategy is close to that of Georg Simmel before him. It consists in highlighting the""third"" that lies between the individual and society, which connects them. Simmel calls this ""third"" ""Wechselwirkung"". Elias speaks about ""figuration"". In this article, we consider how successful Elias' strategy is, its merits an

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Society of Individuals: How to Solve the Dilemma of Individualism and Holism in Historical Sociology

Popis výsledku anglicky

One of the questions that Norbert Elias tries to resolve in his work - either explicitly or implicitly - is the issue of the relationship between the individual and society. Elias critically assesses two approaches to this issue that sociology offered inhis time, namely the Weberian conception of individualism that postulates the human individual as the starting point of sociological thought, and the Durkheimian conception of holism, which considered society as a whole as the starting point, giving regard to holistic, supra-individual social facts. Elias considers both of these solutions one-sided and unsatisfactory, and in his conception tries to supercede them. His strategy is close to that of Georg Simmel before him. It consists in highlighting the""third"" that lies between the individual and society, which connects them. Simmel calls this ""third"" ""Wechselwirkung"". Elias speaks about ""figuration"". In this article, we consider how successful Elias' strategy is, its merits an

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AO - Sociologie, demografie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA15-14478S" target="_blank" >GA15-14478S: Homo Sociologicus Revisited</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Historická sociologie

ISSN

1804-0616

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2015

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

9-23

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—