Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Re-thinking the place of semiotics in Fashion Studies

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F16%3A10330716" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/16:10330716 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://www.isem.es/centro/isem/files/file/ActasDef2016_918.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.isem.es/centro/isem/files/file/ActasDef2016_918.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Re-thinking the place of semiotics in Fashion Studies

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The view of fashion as a system of signification, first introduced in the important work of Roland Barthes The Fashion System (1967), has been dominant since the development of Fashion Studies. But today, the concept of fashion as a homogenous system with a particular core has become problematic. It appears that the rhetoric of contemporary fashion is more "sophisticated" than in Barthes' system. If he described fashion as tyrannical machine, which converts its unmotivated signs into a natural fact, contemporary fashion has "content" besides the rhetorical mode. Moreover, not only has the system of fashion dramatically changed, but scholarly work on fashion has shifted from the regime of representation to embodiment. Postmodern culture is preoccupied with differences, and a number of theorists even solemnize about the crisis of the concept of sign. Turning away from semiotics, Fashion Studies has been enriched by notions of materiality, flexible identity and performance. Theorists claim that our relationship with garments has become more personal. At the same time, the individual aspect is still deeply bound up with collective narratives. Although an exact equivalence of the signifier with the signified is not possible in the system of fashion, it evidently does not exist without codes. This article addresses the legacy of Barthes' Fashion System, discusses challenges for semiotics of fashion in the 21st century and estimates limits and possibilities of a systemic approach to contemporary fashion.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Re-thinking the place of semiotics in Fashion Studies

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The view of fashion as a system of signification, first introduced in the important work of Roland Barthes The Fashion System (1967), has been dominant since the development of Fashion Studies. But today, the concept of fashion as a homogenous system with a particular core has become problematic. It appears that the rhetoric of contemporary fashion is more "sophisticated" than in Barthes' system. If he described fashion as tyrannical machine, which converts its unmotivated signs into a natural fact, contemporary fashion has "content" besides the rhetorical mode. Moreover, not only has the system of fashion dramatically changed, but scholarly work on fashion has shifted from the regime of representation to embodiment. Postmodern culture is preoccupied with differences, and a number of theorists even solemnize about the crisis of the concept of sign. Turning away from semiotics, Fashion Studies has been enriched by notions of materiality, flexible identity and performance. Theorists claim that our relationship with garments has become more personal. At the same time, the individual aspect is still deeply bound up with collective narratives. Although an exact equivalence of the signifier with the signified is not possible in the system of fashion, it evidently does not exist without codes. This article addresses the legacy of Barthes' Fashion System, discusses challenges for semiotics of fashion in the 21st century and estimates limits and possibilities of a systemic approach to contemporary fashion.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    O - Ostatní výsledky

  • CEP obor

    AL - Umění, architektura, kulturní dědictví

  • OECD FORD obor

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2016

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů