Elaborating the Philosophical Dimensions: The Development of Historical-Comparative Sociology in Johann Pall Arnason's Civilizational Analysis

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F16%3A10333073" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/16:10333073 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/si20162214" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/si20162214</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/si20162214" target="_blank" >10.5840/si20162214</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Elaborating the Philosophical Dimensions: The Development of Historical-Comparative Sociology in Johann Pall Arnason's Civilizational Analysis

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article deals with the work of the Icelandic sociologist and philosopher Johann Pall Arnason (*1940) and with his concept of 'civilizational analysis', which is nowadays understood as a subdiscipline of historical-comparative sociology. More precisely, I want to show that Arnason's original interpretation of civilizational analysis goes beyond the mainstream understanding of historical sociology as a dialogue between history and sociology in favour of philosophical approaches. By outlining the three levels of Arnason's civilizational analysis - (I.) the reconstruction of the concept of 'civilization', incl. its history, (II.) the link to philosophical sources and (III.) the theoretical development of Eisenstadt's heritage - the article shows that, according to Arnason, the concept of 'civilization' is understood as the field of convergence of the historical-sociological concepts of 'culture' (Max Weber, Shmuel N. Eisenstadt) on the one hand, and the philosophical concepts of the 'world' (Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Jan Patočka, Cornelius Castoriadis) on the other. Arnason thus, defining 'culture' as the so-called 'interpretative articulation of the world', emphasizes the motif of 'cultural creativity', which is present, yet theoretically underdeveloped, both in Weber's and Eisenstadt's work. In this light, the article finally focuses on Arnason's most recent attempts to discuss Eisenstadt's concept of the 'civilizational dimension' of modernity. It deals primarily with the terms 'cultural ontology' and 'civilizational paradox', in which the need to link historical sociology to philosophical perspectives is most evident. The civilizational approach is thus introduced as the crucial framework of Arnason's elaboration of the philosophical dimensions in sociological analysis.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Elaborating the Philosophical Dimensions: The Development of Historical-Comparative Sociology in Johann Pall Arnason's Civilizational Analysis

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article deals with the work of the Icelandic sociologist and philosopher Johann Pall Arnason (*1940) and with his concept of 'civilizational analysis', which is nowadays understood as a subdiscipline of historical-comparative sociology. More precisely, I want to show that Arnason's original interpretation of civilizational analysis goes beyond the mainstream understanding of historical sociology as a dialogue between history and sociology in favour of philosophical approaches. By outlining the three levels of Arnason's civilizational analysis - (I.) the reconstruction of the concept of 'civilization', incl. its history, (II.) the link to philosophical sources and (III.) the theoretical development of Eisenstadt's heritage - the article shows that, according to Arnason, the concept of 'civilization' is understood as the field of convergence of the historical-sociological concepts of 'culture' (Max Weber, Shmuel N. Eisenstadt) on the one hand, and the philosophical concepts of the 'world' (Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Jan Patočka, Cornelius Castoriadis) on the other. Arnason thus, defining 'culture' as the so-called 'interpretative articulation of the world', emphasizes the motif of 'cultural creativity', which is present, yet theoretically underdeveloped, both in Weber's and Eisenstadt's work. In this light, the article finally focuses on Arnason's most recent attempts to discuss Eisenstadt's concept of the 'civilizational dimension' of modernity. It deals primarily with the terms 'cultural ontology' and 'civilizational paradox', in which the need to link historical sociology to philosophical perspectives is most evident. The civilizational approach is thus introduced as the crucial framework of Arnason's elaboration of the philosophical dimensions in sociological analysis.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AO - Sociologie, demografie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Social Imaginaries

ISSN

2393-2503

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2, Autumn 2016

Stát vydavatele periodika

RO - Rumunsko

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

105-120

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—