Comparison of shared care in the Czech Republic and Slovak Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F17%3A10363080" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/17:10363080 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/DOI" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/DOI</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2017/33/S12.019" target="_blank" >10.5593/sgemsocial2017/33/S12.019</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of shared care in the Czech Republic and Slovak Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper covers comparison of process making decision on shared care in the Czech Republic and Slovak Republic. It speaks about all elements of this chain including not only members present in the courtroom but also links having indirect influence on the final decision of the court about shared care. Almost a quarter of families with small children must deal with family breakdown, which can be described as potentially one of the most pressing social problems. Most of the children after a divorce is in a custody of one parent, mostly a mother. Although family law also regulates other forms childcare after separation of parents, in practice, they are not yet in widespread use. In the framework of the amendment to the Family Law emerged arguments of supporters and opponents shared care, a public debate on this topic appeared. In principle, there is no uniformity of view on what is important for establishing shared care, whether for example the parents together must first &quot;reasonably&quot; communicate, or whether they must be complied with financial, housing, or both. Finally, just as there must be suitable conditions for the child, somehow also the child must be appropriate - not every child will welcome the rotation of parental care. There become vocal as help for child authorities of child protection, civil associations specializing in helping a child in a period after separation of the parents, psychological counselling, and mediators alike. What is important is the cooperation of these system components and this appeal is among differences the one of the similar needs for both Czechia and Slovakia.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of shared care in the Czech Republic and Slovak Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper covers comparison of process making decision on shared care in the Czech Republic and Slovak Republic. It speaks about all elements of this chain including not only members present in the courtroom but also links having indirect influence on the final decision of the court about shared care. Almost a quarter of families with small children must deal with family breakdown, which can be described as potentially one of the most pressing social problems. Most of the children after a divorce is in a custody of one parent, mostly a mother. Although family law also regulates other forms childcare after separation of parents, in practice, they are not yet in widespread use. In the framework of the amendment to the Family Law emerged arguments of supporters and opponents shared care, a public debate on this topic appeared. In principle, there is no uniformity of view on what is important for establishing shared care, whether for example the parents together must first &quot;reasonably&quot; communicate, or whether they must be complied with financial, housing, or both. Finally, just as there must be suitable conditions for the child, somehow also the child must be appropriate - not every child will welcome the rotation of parental care. There become vocal as help for child authorities of child protection, civil associations specializing in helping a child in a period after separation of the parents, psychological counselling, and mediators alike. What is important is the cooperation of these system components and this appeal is among differences the one of the similar needs for both Czechia and Slovakia.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50401 - Sociology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

SGEM : International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social sciences and Arts. Book 3

ISBN

978-619-7408-20-1

ISSN

2367-5659

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

143-150

Název nakladatele

STEF92 Technology

Místo vydání

Sofia, Bulharsko

Místo konání akce

Albena, Bulharsko

Datum konání akce

22. 8. 2017

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—