Unnatural as a Category in Sexual Ethics
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F17%3A10363623" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/17:10363623 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.clovekaspolocnost.sk/sk/rocnik-20-rok-2017/3/diskusia/unnatural-as-a-category-in-sexual-ethics/" target="_blank" >http://www.clovekaspolocnost.sk/sk/rocnik-20-rok-2017/3/diskusia/unnatural-as-a-category-in-sexual-ethics/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Unnatural as a Category in Sexual Ethics
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The aim of the text is to provide a description as well as a philosophical analysis of the possible meanings of the words "natural" and "unnatural" in sexual ethics. All the "unnatural" acts are seen in the light of three distinctive levels of the term ethics: manners , morality and ethics. Morality is mainly focussed on, and four possible moral views of sexual conduct are taken into account: traditionalistic, romantic, Marxist-feminist and liberal view. Based on these four approaches to the ethics of sexuality and putting aside all moralising based on the universalization of one particular idea of an individual, four possible meanings of "unnatural" can be considered: comparison with animals, the usage of body organs in an inappropriate way, the unconventionality of certain acts and finally an innate desire-based behaviour. The validity of these meanings is then analysed and in conclusion the suggestion is made that the general reason for calling certain acts "unnatural" in sexual ethics is merely a visceral distaste for certain activities.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Unnatural as a Category in Sexual Ethics
Popis výsledku anglicky
The aim of the text is to provide a description as well as a philosophical analysis of the possible meanings of the words "natural" and "unnatural" in sexual ethics. All the "unnatural" acts are seen in the light of three distinctive levels of the term ethics: manners , morality and ethics. Morality is mainly focussed on, and four possible moral views of sexual conduct are taken into account: traditionalistic, romantic, Marxist-feminist and liberal view. Based on these four approaches to the ethics of sexuality and putting aside all moralising based on the universalization of one particular idea of an individual, four possible meanings of "unnatural" can be considered: comparison with animals, the usage of body organs in an inappropriate way, the unconventionality of certain acts and finally an innate desire-based behaviour. The validity of these meanings is then analysed and in conclusion the suggestion is made that the general reason for calling certain acts "unnatural" in sexual ethics is merely a visceral distaste for certain activities.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Človek a spoločnosť [online]
ISSN
1335-3608
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
20
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
60-69
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—