Punish and Rehabilitate through Work: Institutions, Discourses, and Agency in Central, Eastern, and Western Europe at the End of the 19th and in the first half of the 20th century

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F24%3A10498871" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/24:10498871 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.hiu.cas.cz/en/events/punish-and-rehabilitate-through-work-institutions-discourses-and-agency-in-central-eastern-and-western-europe-at-the-end-of-the-19th-and-in-the-first-half-of-the-20th-century" target="_blank" >https://www.hiu.cas.cz/en/events/punish-and-rehabilitate-through-work-institutions-discourses-and-agency-in-central-eastern-and-western-europe-at-the-end-of-the-19th-and-in-the-first-half-of-the-20th-century</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Punish and Rehabilitate through Work: Institutions, Discourses, and Agency in Central, Eastern, and Western Europe at the End of the 19th and in the first half of the 20th century

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Workhouse, house of correction, reformatory, forced labour colony, disciplinary labour camp, etc. - these are only a few designations of the disciplinary institutions that proliferated across Eastern, Central, and Western Europe during the late 19th and in the first half of the 20th century. These disciplinary institutions served a dual purpose of confinement as well as correction. Behind their walls or within their compounds, citizens who deviated from the prevailing middle-class norms of &quot;proper work&quot; and &quot;decent behaviour&quot; were confined as well as corrected by making use of their labour. The declared aim of such institutions, whose tradition dates back to the early modern period, was therefore not only to punish individuals whose mobility, livelihood and other types of conduct were criminalised, but also to turn &quot;alcoholics&quot;, &quot;beggars&quot;, &quot;delinquents&quot;, &quot;pimps&quot;, &quot;prostitutes&quot;, and &quot;vagrants&quot;, to name only a few groups who were targeted, into &quot;orderly citizens&quot;.Issues we would like contributors to address in the workshop are:1. INSTITUTIONS AND ACTORSWhat functions did these disciplinary institutions perform in the broader context of social processes of exclusion and inclusion?How did the constitutive tension between the rehabilitation and confinement of inmates affect the position of these institutions within gradually diverging systems of punishment and social welfare?Which actors (e.g. different bodies of the state, municipalities, churches, private companies etc.) were involved in different aspects of these institutions and in which ways?2. IDEAS AND PRACTICESHow to interpret the relationship between the diverse contemporary discourses of rehabilitation and punishment, and the changing practice of the disciplinary institutions such as continental workhouses, forced labour camps and reformatories?What role did the disciplinary institutions play in the discourses and imaginations of social outcasts, especially those who were labelled as &quot;Gypsies&quot;?Did these popular as well as expert ideas and discourses shape the practice?3. INMATES AND STAFFWho actually were the people confined in these institutions, in terms of their age, gender, class, professions, ethnicity, nationality, etc.?Why were they confined and in what ways were they deemed to need reforming?Who was recruited as staff in the disciplinary institutions and how?4. LABOUR AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCYWhat kinds of labour were used to correct male and female convicts and what concepts (e.g. forced labour or convict labour) could be used in order to capture the complexities of penal and economic goals?How were the inmates&apos; conditions negotiated in relation to the labour market, wages, etc. in the outside world?5. EVERYDAY LIFE AND METHODOLOGYWhat were the living conditions and everyday life of the inmates and how did the everyday life of male and female convicts differ?How were the social hierarchies and order negotiated by the inmates and the staff?What types of sources and methods can be used in order to reconstruct everyday life and to capture the agency of the inmates and how?6. (DIS-)CONTINUITIESHow did these disciplinary institutions change over time?What role did the agency of inmates play in particular?How were they influenced by political development of the state or local administrations?

Název v anglickém jazyce

Punish and Rehabilitate through Work: Institutions, Discourses, and Agency in Central, Eastern, and Western Europe at the End of the 19th and in the first half of the 20th century

Popis výsledku anglicky

Workhouse, house of correction, reformatory, forced labour colony, disciplinary labour camp, etc. - these are only a few designations of the disciplinary institutions that proliferated across Eastern, Central, and Western Europe during the late 19th and in the first half of the 20th century. These disciplinary institutions served a dual purpose of confinement as well as correction. Behind their walls or within their compounds, citizens who deviated from the prevailing middle-class norms of &quot;proper work&quot; and &quot;decent behaviour&quot; were confined as well as corrected by making use of their labour. The declared aim of such institutions, whose tradition dates back to the early modern period, was therefore not only to punish individuals whose mobility, livelihood and other types of conduct were criminalised, but also to turn &quot;alcoholics&quot;, &quot;beggars&quot;, &quot;delinquents&quot;, &quot;pimps&quot;, &quot;prostitutes&quot;, and &quot;vagrants&quot;, to name only a few groups who were targeted, into &quot;orderly citizens&quot;.Issues we would like contributors to address in the workshop are:1. INSTITUTIONS AND ACTORSWhat functions did these disciplinary institutions perform in the broader context of social processes of exclusion and inclusion?How did the constitutive tension between the rehabilitation and confinement of inmates affect the position of these institutions within gradually diverging systems of punishment and social welfare?Which actors (e.g. different bodies of the state, municipalities, churches, private companies etc.) were involved in different aspects of these institutions and in which ways?2. IDEAS AND PRACTICESHow to interpret the relationship between the diverse contemporary discourses of rehabilitation and punishment, and the changing practice of the disciplinary institutions such as continental workhouses, forced labour camps and reformatories?What role did the disciplinary institutions play in the discourses and imaginations of social outcasts, especially those who were labelled as &quot;Gypsies&quot;?Did these popular as well as expert ideas and discourses shape the practice?3. INMATES AND STAFFWho actually were the people confined in these institutions, in terms of their age, gender, class, professions, ethnicity, nationality, etc.?Why were they confined and in what ways were they deemed to need reforming?Who was recruited as staff in the disciplinary institutions and how?4. LABOUR AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCYWhat kinds of labour were used to correct male and female convicts and what concepts (e.g. forced labour or convict labour) could be used in order to capture the complexities of penal and economic goals?How were the inmates&apos; conditions negotiated in relation to the labour market, wages, etc. in the outside world?5. EVERYDAY LIFE AND METHODOLOGYWhat were the living conditions and everyday life of the inmates and how did the everyday life of male and female convicts differ?How were the social hierarchies and order negotiated by the inmates and the staff?What types of sources and methods can be used in order to reconstruct everyday life and to capture the agency of the inmates and how?6. (DIS-)CONTINUITIESHow did these disciplinary institutions change over time?What role did the agency of inmates play in particular?How were they influenced by political development of the state or local administrations?

Druh

M - Uspořádání konference

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Místo konání akce

Praha

Stát konání akce

CZ - Česká republika

Datum zahájení akce

—

Datum ukončení akce

—

Celkový počet účastníků

25

Počet zahraničních účastníků

14

Typ akce podle státní přísl. účastníků

EUR - Evropská akce