A New Interpretation of Heidegger on the Pre-Socratics

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11260%2F24%3A10495404" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11260/24:10495404 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=P8OVMv0Rd7" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=P8OVMv0Rd7</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.26362/20240207" target="_blank" >10.26362/20240207</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A New Interpretation of Heidegger on the Pre-Socratics

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In The Presocratics in the Thought of Martin Heidegger, W. Julian KorabKarpowicz presents a new interpretation of this important theme in the later Heidegger. Korab-Karpowicz argues that the relationship between the early and late Heidegger can be understood as analogous to the relationship between a question and an answer; the later Heidegger provides the answer to the question which the early Heidegger posed, but he discovers this answer in the fragments of Anaximander, Heraclitus and Parmenides. I argue that Korab-Karpowicz fails to substantiate his claim and exemplifies both the vices which Heidegger scholarship ought to avoid - obscurantism on the one hand and trivialization on the other. In doing so, however, Korab-Karpowicz performs an important service; he shows what Heidegger scholarship should strive to avoid.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A New Interpretation of Heidegger on the Pre-Socratics

Popis výsledku anglicky

In The Presocratics in the Thought of Martin Heidegger, W. Julian KorabKarpowicz presents a new interpretation of this important theme in the later Heidegger. Korab-Karpowicz argues that the relationship between the early and late Heidegger can be understood as analogous to the relationship between a question and an answer; the later Heidegger provides the answer to the question which the early Heidegger posed, but he discovers this answer in the fragments of Anaximander, Heraclitus and Parmenides. I argue that Korab-Karpowicz fails to substantiate his claim and exemplifies both the vices which Heidegger scholarship ought to avoid - obscurantism on the one hand and trivialization on the other. In doing so, however, Korab-Karpowicz performs an important service; he shows what Heidegger scholarship should strive to avoid.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EH22_010%2F0008115" target="_blank" >EH22_010/0008115: MSCA Fellowships CZ - UK2</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Prolegomena

ISSN

1333-4395

e-ISSN

1846-0593

Svazek periodika

23

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

HR - Chorvatská republika

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

287-295

Kód UT WoS článku

001381941800007

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—