Measuring human remains in the field: Grid technique, total station, or MicroScribe?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F12%3A10124522" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/12:10124522 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/68081766:_____/12:00383800 RIV/49777513:23330/12:43915442

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.03.018" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.03.018</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.03.018" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.03.018</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Measuring human remains in the field: Grid technique, total station, or MicroScribe?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Although three-dimensional (3D) coordinates for human intra-skeletal landmarks are among the most important data that anthropologists have to record in the field, little is known about the reliability of various measuring techniques. We compared the reliability of three techniques used for 3D measurement of human remain in the field: grid technique (GT), total station (TS), and MicroScribe (MS). We measured 365 field osteometric points on 12 skeletal sequences excavated at the Late Medieval/Early Modernchurchyard in Vs. eruby, Czech Republic. We compared intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-technique variation using mean difference (MD), mean absolute difference (MAD), standard deviation of difference (SDD), and limits of agreement (LA). All three measuring techniques can be used when accepted error ranges can be measured in centimeters. When a range of accepted error measurable in millimeters is needed, MS offers the best solution. TS can achieve the same reliability as does MS,

Název v anglickém jazyce

Measuring human remains in the field: Grid technique, total station, or MicroScribe?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Although three-dimensional (3D) coordinates for human intra-skeletal landmarks are among the most important data that anthropologists have to record in the field, little is known about the reliability of various measuring techniques. We compared the reliability of three techniques used for 3D measurement of human remain in the field: grid technique (GT), total station (TS), and MicroScribe (MS). We measured 365 field osteometric points on 12 skeletal sequences excavated at the Late Medieval/Early Modernchurchyard in Vs. eruby, Czech Republic. We compared intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-technique variation using mean difference (MD), mean absolute difference (MAD), standard deviation of difference (SDD), and limits of agreement (LA). All three measuring techniques can be used when accepted error ranges can be measured in centimeters. When a range of accepted error measurable in millimeters is needed, MS offers the best solution. TS can achieve the same reliability as does MS,

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AC - Archeologie, antropologie, etnologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL

ISSN

0379-0738

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

221

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1-3

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

16-22

Kód UT WoS článku

000306967300013

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—